Representability of binary relations through fuzzy numbers

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volumn 157, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-19

  Campión, María J ^a   Candeal, Juan C ^b   Induráin, Esteban ^a  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Fuzzy numbers; Preference modelling

Indexed keywords

BINARY SEQUENCES; DECISION THEORY; NUMBER THEORY;

BINARY RELATIONS; FUZZY NUMBERS; INTERVAL ORDERS; PREFERENCE MODELING;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 27344443524     PISSN: 01650114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. R. Agaev, and F. Aleskerov Interval choice: classic and general cases Math. Social Sci. 26 1993 249 272
2. R.F. Albrecht Topological interpretation of fuzzy sets and intervals Fuzzy Sets and Systems 135 2003 11 20
3. J.C.R. Alcantud, and C. Rodríguez-Palmero Characterization of the existence of semicontinuous weak utilities J. Math. Econom. 32 1999 503 509
4. J.F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals J. ACM 26 1983 832 843
5. W.E. Armstrong A note on the theory of consumer's behavior Oxford Econom. Papers 2 1950 119 122
6. K.J. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values 1963 Wiley New York
7. K.J. Arrow, and F. Hahn General Competitive Analysis 1971 Oliver and Boyd Edinburgh
8. A.F. Beardon, J.C. Candeal, G. Herden, E. Induráin, and G.B. Mehta The non-existence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations J. Math. Econom. 37 2002 17 38
9. T. Bilgiç Interval-valued preference structures European J. Oper. Res. 105 1998 162 183
10. T. Bilgiç, Fusing interval preferences, Proc. of EUROFUSE Workshop on Preference Modelling and Applications, Granada, Spain, 2001, pp. 253-258.
11. G. Birkhoff Lattice Theory third ed. 1967 American Mathematical Society Providence, RI
12. G. Bosi, J.C. Candeal, E. Induráin, E. Olóriz, and M. Zudaire Numerical representations of interval orders Order 18 2001 171 190
13. G. Bosi, J.C. Candeal, E. Induráin, and M. Zudaire Existence of homogeneous representations of interval orders on a cone in a topological vector space Soc. Choice Welf. 24 2005 45 61
14. G. Bosi, and R. Isler Representing preferences with nontransitive indifference by a single real-valued function J. Math. Econom. 24 1995 621 631
15. D.S. Bridges Numerical representations of intransitive preferences on a countable set J. Econom. Theory 30 1983 213 217
16. D.S. Bridges, and G.B. Mehta Representations of Preference Orderings 1995 Springer Berlin
17. A.J. Burusco, and R. Fuentes-González The study of interval-valued contexts Fuzzy Sets and Systems 121 2001 439 452
18. J.C. Candeal, E. Induráin, and M. Zudaire Numerical representability of semiorders Math. Social Sci. 43 1 2002 61 77
19. G. Cantor Beiträge zur Begründung der transfinite Mengenlehre I Math. Ann. 46 1895 481 512
20. J.P. Doignon, A. Ducamp, and J.C. Falmagne On realizable biorders and the biorder dimension of a relation J. Math. Psych. 28 1984 73 109
21. D. Dubois, and H. Prade Operations on fuzzy numbers Internat. J. Systems Sci. 9 6 1978 613 626
22. J. Dugundji Topology 1966 Allyn and Bacon Boston
23. G.T. Fechner Elemente der Psychophysik 1860 Breitkopf und Hartel Leipzig
24. P.C. Fishburn Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals J. Math. Psych. 7 1970 144 149
25. P.C. Fishburn Intransitive indifference in preference theory: a survey Oper. Res. 18 2 1970 207 228
26. P.C. Fishburn Utility Theory for Decision-making 1970 Wiley New York
27. P.C. Fishburn Interval representations for interval orders and semiorders J. Math. Psych. 10 1973 91 105
28. P.C. Fishburn Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey Management Sci. 20 11 1974 1442 1471
29. P.C. Fishburn Interval Orders and Interval Graphs 1985 Wiley New York
30. P.C. Fishburn Preference structures and their numerical representations Theoret. Comput. Sci. 217 1999 359 383
31. G. Gierz, K.H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J.D. Lawson, M. Mislove, and D.S. Scott Continuous Lattices and Domains 2003 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
32. G. Herden, and G.B. Mehta The Debreu Gap Lemma and some generalizations J. Math. Econom. 40 7 2004 747 769
33. D.W. Katzner Static Demand Theory 1970 Macmillan London
34. A. Kaufmann, and M.M. Gupta Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Theory and Applications 1985 Van Nostrand Reinhold Company New York
35. D. Krantz, D.R. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky Foundations of Measurement 1971 Academic Press New York
36. V. Levin Measurable utility theorems for closed and lexicographic preference relations Soviet Math. Dokl. 27 1983 639 643
37. R.D. Luce Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination Econometrica 24 1956 178 191
38. G.B. Mehta Preference and utility S. Barberà P. Hammond C. Seidl Handbook of Utility Theory 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 1 47
39. R. Moore, and W. Lodwick Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory Fuzzy Sets and Systems 135 2003 5 9
40. V. Novák Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications 1989 Adam Hilger Bristol and Philadelphia
41. E. Olóriz, J.C. Candeal, and E. Induráin Representability of interval orders J. Econom. Theory 78 1 1998 219 227
42. I. Pe'er, and R. Shamir Satisfiability problems on intervals and unit intervals Theoret. Comput. Sci. 175 1997 349 372
43. J. Pfanzagl Theory of Measurement 1968 Physica-Verlag Würzburg Wien
44. M. Pirlot, and Ph. Vincke Semiorders 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
45. J. Riguet Les rélations de Ferrers Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris 1951 1729 1730
46. F.S. Roberts Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility, and the Social Sciences 1979 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
47. W. Shafer The nontransitive consumer Econometrica 42 1974 913 919
48. P. Swistak Some representation problems for semiorders J. Math. Psych. 21 2 1980 124 135
49. A. Tsoukiàs, and Ph. Vincke A characterization of PQI interval orders Discrete Appl. Math. 127 2003 387 397
50. A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences Psychological Rev. 76 1 1969 31 48
51. N. Wiener Contribution to the theory of relative position Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 17 1914 441 449