A two-sided optimization for theater ballistic missile defense

Operations Research

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 745-763

  Brown, Gerald ^a   Carlyle, Matthew ^a   Diehl, Douglas ^a   Kline, Jeffrey ^a   Wood, Kevin ^a  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilevel integer linear program; Missile defense; Mixed integer linear program; Optimization

Indexed keywords

BILEVEL INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAM; MISSILE DEFENSE; MIXED-INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAM; PLANNING TOOLS;

BALLISTICS; CIVIL DEFENSE; GUNS (ARMAMENT); MISSILES; OPTIMIZATION;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 27344439516     PISSN: 0030364X     EISSN: 15265463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1050.0231     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Army Times. 2004. Destroyer patrol is first step in defense against missile attacks. Associated Press, October 1. Retrieved September 8, 2005. http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-382918.php.
2. Bracken, J., P. S. Brooks, J. E. Falk. 1987. Robust preallocated preferential defense. Naval Res. Logist. 34 1-22.
3. Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, R. Raman. 1998. GAMS: A User's Guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC.
4. Brown, G. G., W. M. Carlyle, R. C. Harney, E. M. Skroch, R. K. Wood. 2004. Interdicting a nuclear weapons project (in review).
5. Central Intelligence Agency. 2001. Foieign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat Through 2015. Unclassified summary of the National Intelligence Estimate produced by the National Intelligence Council. Retrieved May 28, 2004 from http://www.cia.gov/nic/special_missilethreat2001.html.
6. Danskin, J. M. 1967. The Theory of Max-Min. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Department of Defense. 2004. Fiscal 2005 Department of Defense Budget Release, February 2. Retrieved March 19, 2004 from http://east.defenselink.mil/ releases/2004/nr20040202-0301.html.
8. Department of the Army. 1999. FY 99 Air and Missile Defense Master Plan (1999), Chapter 2-Threat. Retrieved May 24, 2004 from http://fas.org/spp/ starwars/docops/amd99.
9. Department of the Army. 2000a. Field Manual FM 3-01.11. Appendix A -ADA Employment Principles, Guidelines, and Priorities. Retrieved May 3, 2004 from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/.
10. Department of the Army. 2000b. Army Field Manual FM 44-100, Chapter 4. Fundamentals of Army Air and Missile Defense Operations. Retrieved May 3, 2004 from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/.
11. Diehl, D. D. 2004. How to optimize joint theater ballistic missile defense. Master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
12. Eckler, A. R., S. A. Burr. 1972. Mathematical Models of Target Coverage and Missile Allocation. Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, VA.
13. Federation of American Scientists. 2003. DPRK-Special Weapons Facilities. Retrieved April 13, 2004 from http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/facility/ index.html.
14. Federation of American Scientists. 2004. C-201/HY-2/SY-1 CSS-N-2/CSS-C-3/SEERSUCKER. Retrieved May 24, 2004 from http://www.fas.org/man/ dod-101/sys/missile/row/c-201.htm.
15. Fulkerson, D. R., G. C. Harding. 1977. Maximizing the minimum source-sink path subject to a budget constraint. Math. Programming 13 116-118.
16. Golden, B. 1978. A problem in network interdiction. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 25 711-713.
17. ILOG. 2003. ILOG CPLEX 9.0 user's manual. ILOG S.A., Gentilly Cedex, France.
18. Israeli, E., R. K. Wood. 2002. Shortest-path network interdiction. Networks 40 97-111.
19. Jane's. 2003a. C4I Systems, Command Information Systems-Naval, United States. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from www4.janes.com.
20. Jane's. 2003b. Electro-Optic Systems 2002-2003, Naval Systems-Surface-to-Air Missiles, United States. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from www4.janes.com.
21. Jane's. 2003c. Land Base Air Defense, Static and Towed Surface-to-Air Missile Systems, United States. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from www4.janes.com.
22. Jane's. 2003d. Strategic Weapon Systems 38, Offensive Weapons, Korea, North. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from www4.janes.com.
23. Jane's. 2003e. Strategic Weapon Systems 39, Defensive Weapons, United States. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from www4.janes.com.
24. Lanchester, F. W. 1916. Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm. Constable and Co., London, UK.
25. Luo, Z. Q., J. S. Pang, D. Ralph. 1996. Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Matheson, J. D. 1975. Multidimensional preferential strategies. Analytic Services, Inc., report no. SDN 75-3, Arlington, VA, November, National Technical Information Service Number ADA021224/1.
27. Microsoft Corporation. 2004. Windows XP Home Page. Retrieved May 24, 2004 from http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/default.asp.
28. Moore, J. T., J. F. Bard. 1990. The mixed integer linear bilevel programming problem. Oper. Res. 38 911-921.
29. Owen, G. 1969. Minimization of fatalities in a nuclear attack model. Oper. Res. 17 489-505.
30. Phillips, C. 1993. The network inhibition problem. Proc. 25th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. ACM Press, San Diego, CA, 776-785.
31. Salmeron, J., K. Wood, R. Baldick. 2004. Analysis of electric grid security under terrorist threat. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 19 905-912.
32. Silicon Graphics Incorporated. 2003. Press release, February 12. Retrieved April 25, 2004 from http://www.sig.com/newsroom/press_releases/2003/ february/q2_wins.html.
33. Skroch, E. 2004. How to optimally interdict a belligerent project to develop a nuclear weapon. Master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
34. Sparta, Inc. 2004. Commander's Analysis and Planning Simulation (CAPS), v 8.0 user's manual. Sparta, Inc., San Diego, CA.
35. von Stackelberg, H. 1952. The Theory of the Market Economy (translated from German). William Hodge & Co., London, UK.
36. Whiteman, P. S. 2000. Improving the effectiveness of single-strike effectiveness for network interdiction. Military Oper. Res. 4 15-30.
37. Wood, R. K. 1993. Deterministic network interdiction. Math. Comput. Model. 17 1-18.