Hanbury Brown Twiss effects for ultracold quantum gases

Science

Volumn 310, Issue 5748, 2005, Pages 648-651

  Schellekens, M ^a   Hoppeler, R ^a   Perrin, A ^a   Gomes, J Viana ^a,b   Boiron, D ^a   Aspect, A ^a   Westbrook, C I ^a  

^a UNIV PARIS SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS;

HANBURY BROWN TWISS EFFECT; THERMAL CLOUD; ULTRACOLD QUANTUM GASES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

PHYSICS;

ARTICLE; BOSON; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; FERMION; GAS; INTERFEROMETER; LIGHT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OPTICS; OSCILLATION; PHOTON; PHYSICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; VELOCITY;

EID: 27344437486     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1118024     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. R. Hanbury Brown, R. Q. Twiss, Nature 177, 27 (1956).
2. F. T. Arecchi, E. Gatti, A. Sona, Phys. Lett. 20, 27 (1966).
3. R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 84 (1963).
4. R. J. Glauber, Quantum Optics and Electronics, C. DeWitt, A. Blandin, C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Eds. (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965), p. 63.
5. G. Baym, Acta Phys. Pol. B 29, 1839 (1998).
6. B. Berne, R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering (Dover, New York, 2000).
7. U. Fano, Am. J. Phys. 29, 539 (1961).
8. R. Hanbury Brown, R. Twiss, Nature 178, 1046 (1956).
9. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, ed. 2, 2004).
10. M. Yasuda, F. Shimizu, Phys. Sev. Lett. 77, 3090 (1996).
11. S. Fölling et al. Nature 434, 481 (2005).
12. M. Greiner, C. A. Regal, J. T. Stewart, D. S. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 110401 (2005).
13. M. Henny et al., Science 284, 296 (1999).
14. W. D. Oliver, J. Kim, R. C. Liu, Y. Yamamoto, Science 284, 299 (1999).
15. H. Kiesel, A. Renz, F. Hasselbach, Nature 418, 392 (2002).
16. Y. Kagan, B. V. Svistunov, G. V. Shlyapnikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 209 (1985).
17. E. A. Burt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).
18. B. Laburthe Tolra et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 190401 (2004).
19. A. Robert et al., Science 292, 461 (2001); published online 22 March 2001 (10.1126/science.1060622).
20. O. Jagutzki et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 477, 244 (2004).
21. See supporting online materials on Science Online for details.
22. M. Naraschewski, R. Glauber, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4595 (1999).
23. L. Deng et al., Nature 398, 218 (1999).
24. J. Vogels, K. Xu, W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
25. R. Stas, J. McNamara, W. Hogervorst, W. Vassen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 053001 (2004).
26. A. Öttl, S. Ritter, M. Köhl, T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 090404 (2005).
27. After submission of this manuscript, we became aware of a related experiment concerning atom correlations in an atom laser (26). We thank R. Sellem of the Détectíon Temps, Position Image Technology Division (supported by the Mission Ressources et Compétences Technologiques-CNRS Federation FR2764 and by the Université Paris-Sud) for a decisive role in the development of the time-to-digital converter, and O. Jagutzki for advice on delay lines.