Agronomy and soils: Response of cotton to P and K soil fertility gradients in North Carolina

Journal of Cotton Science

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 130-141

  Crozier, Carl R ^a   Walls, Bobby ^b   Hardy, David H ^b   Barnes, J Steven ^c  

^a VG James Research and Extension Center   (United States)

^b Agronomic Division   (United States)

^c Tidewater Research Station   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COTTON; PHOSPHORUS; POTASSIUM; YIELD RESPONSE;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 27244459421     PISSN: 15243303     EISSN: 15243303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adeli, A., and J.J. Varco. 2002. Potassium management effects on cotton yield, nutrition, and soil potassium level. J. Plant Nutr. 25:2229-2242.
2. Baker, W.H, S.J. McConnell, and C.S. Snyder. 1994. Assessing the potassium status of cotton using tissue tests. p. 1602. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Diego, CA. 5-8 Jan. 1994. Natl. Cotton Counc., Memphis, TN.
3. Bassett, D.M., and A.J. MacKenzie. 1976. Plant analysis as a guide to cotton fertilization. p. 16-17. In H.M. Reisenauer (ed.) Soil and plant-tissue testing in California. Bull. 1879. Coop. Ext. Serv., Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
4. Bauer, P.J., O.L. May, and J.J. Camberato. 1998. Planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties. J. Prod. Agric. 11:415-420.
5. Bennet, O.L., R.D. Rouse, D.A. Ashley, and B.D. Doss. 1965. Yield, fiber quality and potassium content of irrigated cotton plants as affected by rates of potassium. Agron. J. 57:296-299.
6. Bingham, F.T. 1966. Phosphorus. p. 324-361. In H.D. Chapman (ed.) Diagnostic criteria for plants and soils. University of California, Division of Agric. Sci., Davis, CA.
7. Cassman, K.G., T.A. Kerby, and B.A. Roberts. 1989. Influence of soil and plant potassium on fiber quality and components of yield. p. 501. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 2-7 Jan. 1989. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
8. Cate, R.B. Jr., and L.A. Nelson. 1971. A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35:658-660.
9. Cope, J.T. 1984. Relationships among rates of N, P, and K, soil test values, leaf analysis and yield of cotton at 6 locations. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:253-276.
10. Corey, R.B. 1990. Physical-chemical aspects of nutrient availability. p. 11-24. In R.L. Westerman (ed.) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. SSSA, Madison, WI.
11. Cox, F.R. 1994a. Current phosphorus availability indices: characteristics and shortcomings. p. 101-103. In J.L. Havlin and J.S. Jacobsen (ed.) Soil testing: prospects for improving nutrient recommendations. Spec. Publ. 40, SSSA, Madison, WI.
12. Cox, F.R. 1994b. Predicting increases in extractable phosphorus from fertilizing soils of varying clay content. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:1249-1253.
13. Cox, F.R. 1996. Economic phosphorus fertilization using a linear response and plateau function. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 27:531-543.
14. Cox, F.R., and J.S. Barnes. 2002. Peanut, corn, and cotton critical levels for phosphorus and potassium on Goldsboro soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33:1173-1186.
15. Cox, F. R., E.J. Kamprath, and R.E. McCollum. 1981. A descriptive model of soil test nutrient levels following fertilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:529-532.
16. Cox, F.R., and I.D.G. Lins. 1984. A phosphorus soil test interpretation for corn grown on acid soils varying in crystalline clay content. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant. Anal. 15:1481-1491.
17. Crozier, C.R., B. Walls, L.G. Ambrose, and W. Nixon. 2002. Soil, leaf, and petiole analysis data in support of K recommendations for cotton. p. 23-27. In C. E. Stokes (ed.) Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, 15-16 Jan. 2002. Available online at http://agronomy.agr.state.nc.us/sssnc/sssnc02.pdf (verified 13 July 2004).
18. Dahnke, W.C., and R.A. Olson. 1990. Soil test correlation, calibration, and recommendation. p. 45-71. In R.L. Westerman (ed.) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. SSSA, Madison, WI.
19. Davis, J.G., O. Abaye, W. Baker, P. Bauer, R. Boman, T. Cothren, J. Fowler, E. Funderburg, W. Gass, M. Hickey, S. Hodges, D. Howard, J. Kovar, D. Krieg, C. Mitchell, G. Mullins, F. Rhoads, B. Roberts, J. Silvertooth, J. Varco, W. Weir, L. West. 1996. Utilization of potassium buffering capacity to predict cotton yield response to potassium fertilizer: 1992-1994. p. 1391-1394. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Diego, CA. 5-8 Jan. 1994. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
20. Denton, H.P., G.F. Peedin, S.N. Hawks, and S.W. Buol. 1987. Relating the fertility capability classification system to tobacco response to potassium fertilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:1224-1228.
21. Duggan, B., N. Gaff, D. Singh, S. Yeates, and G. Constable. 2003. Cotton yield response to sources, rates and placement of P fertilizers in tropical Australia. p. 2150-2153. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 6-10 Jan. 2003. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
22. Edmisten, K.L., A.C. York, F.H.Yelverton, J.F.Spears, D.T. Bowman, J.S. Bachleler, S.R. Koenning, C.R. Crozier, A. B. Brown, and A. S. Culpepper. 2004. 2004 Cotton Information. Publ. AG-417, North Carolina Coop. Ext. Serv., Raleigh, NC. Available online at http://ipm.ncsu.edu/Production_Guides/Cotton/contents.html (verified 19 July 2004).
23. Gormus, O., and C. Yucel. 2002. Different planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties in the Cukurova region, Turkey. Field Crops Res. 78:141-149.
24. Heckman, J.R., and E.J. Kamprath. 1992. Potassium accumulation and corn yield related to potassium fertilizer rate and placement. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:141-148.
25. Hodges, S.C. 1994. Effects of soil and foliar K on cotton yield in soils of Georgia and North Carolina. p. 1527-1528. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Diego, CA. 5-8 Jan 1994. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
26. Howard, D.D., M.E. Essington, R.M. Hayes, and W.M. Percell. 2001. Potassium fertilization of conventional- and no-till cotton [Online]. J. Cotton Sci. 5:197-205. Available at http://www.cotton.org/journal/2001-2005/4/197.cfm
27. James, D.W., and K.L. Wells. 1990. Soil sample collection and handling: Technique based on source and degree of field variability. p. 25-44. In R.L. Westerman (ed.) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. SSSA, Madison, WI.
28. Long, O.H., and L.F. Seatz. 1953. Correlation of soil tests for available phosphorus and potassium with crop yield responses to fertilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 17:258-262.
29. McCollum, R.E. 1978. Analysis of potato growth under differing P regimes. I. Tuber yields and allocation of dry matter and P. Agron. J. 70:51-57.
30. Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:1409-1416.
31. Mitchell, C.C., and W.H. Baker. 2000. Plant nutrient sufficiency levels and critical values for cotton in the southeastern U.S. (unpaginated). In C.R. Campbell (ed.) Reference Sufficiency Ranges for Plant Analysis in the Southern Region of the United States. Bull. 394, Southern Coop. Series. Available online at http://www.agr.state.nc.us/agronomi/saaesd/cotton.htm (verified 13 July 2004).
32. Mullins, G.L., G.J. Schwab, and C.H. Burmester. 1999. Cotton response to surface applications of potassium fertilizer: a 10-year summary. J. Prod. Agric. 12:434-440.
33. Murphy, B., and C. Hayes. 1999. North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. Publ. 192, North Carolina Dep. Agric. Consumers Serv., Raleigh, NC.
34. Murphy, B., and C. Hayes. 2001. North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. Publ. 198, North Carolina Dep. Agric. Consumers Serv., Raleigh, NC.
35. Murphy, B., and C. Hayes. 2003. North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. North Carolina Dep. Agric. Consumers Serv., Raleigh, NC. Available online at http://www.ncagr.com/stats/crop_fld/fldannyr.htm (verified July 2004).
36. Nixon, W.T., F.R. Walls, K.E. Johnson, R.H. Morris, J.K. Messick, and R.C. Reich. 2002. Cotton response to potassium applications. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Atlanta, GA. 8-13 Jan. 2002. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
37. Perkins, H.H., Jr., D.E. Ethridge, and C.K. Bragg. 1984. Fiber. p. 437-509. In R.J. Kohel and C.F. Lewis (ed.) Cotton. Agronomy Monograph No. 24. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
38. Pettigrew W.T., J.J. Heitholt, and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1996. Genotypic interactions with potassium and nitrogen in cotton of varied maturity. Agron. J. 88:89-93.
39. Sabbe, W.E., and L.J. Zelinski. 1990. Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing cotton. pp. 469-493. In R.L. Westerman (ed.) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. SSSA, Madison, WI.
40. Steel, R.G.D., and J.H.Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
41. Stelly, M., and H.D. Morris. 1953. Residual effect of phosphorus on cotton grown on Cecil soil as determined with radioactive phosphorus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 17:267-269.
42. Tisdale, S.L., W.L. Nelson, J.D. Beaton, and J.L. Havlin. 1993. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
43. Tucker, M.R. 1992a. Determination of phosphorus by Mehlich 3 extraction. p. 6-8. In S.J. Donohue (ed.) Reference Soil and Media Diagnostic Procedures for the Southern Region of the United States. Bull. 374, Southern Coop. Ser., Virginia Agric. Exp. Stn., Blacksburg, VA.
44. Tucker, M.R. 1992b. Determination of potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sodium by Mehlich 3 extraction. p. 9-12. In S.J. Donohue (ed.) Reference Soil and Media Diagnostic Procedures for the Southern Region of the United States. Bull. 374, Southern Coop. Ser., Virginia Agric. Exp. Stn., Blacksburg, VA.
45. Tucker, M.R., J.K. Messick, and C.C. Carter. 1997. Crop fertilization based on North Carolina soil tests. Circular No. 1. N.C. Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Raleigh, NC. Available online at http://www.ncagr.com/agronomi/obook.htm (verified 13 July 2004).
46. Ulrich, A., and K. Ohki. 1966. Potassium. p. 362-393. In H.D. Chapman (ed.) Diagnostic criteria for plants and soils. University of California, Division of Agric. Sci., Davis, CA.
47. Weir, B., R. Miller, D. Munk, B. Rains, B. Roberts, R. Travis, R. Vargas, S. Wright, and M. Keeley. 1996. Nutritional guidelines for potassium in cotton. p. 1353. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.