Using counts of begging young to estimate post-fledging survival in Tawny Owls Strix aluco

Bird Study

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 343-345

  Sunde, Peter ^a,b,c   Markussen, Bettina E N ^b,c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c British Association for Shooting and Conservation   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROOD SIZE; ESTIMATION METHOD; RAPTOR; SURVIVAL;

STRIGIFORMES; STRIX ALUCO;

EID: 27244456844     PISSN: 00063657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00063650509461409     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Coles, C.F. & Petty, S.J. 1997. Dispersal behaviour and survival of juvenile Tawny Owls (Strix aluco) during the low point in a vole cycle. In Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. & Nicholls, T.H. (eds) Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere: 111-118. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-190.
2. Coles, C.F., Petty, S.J., MacKinnon, J.L. & Thomas, C.J. 2003. The role of food supply in the dispersal behaviour of juvenile Tawny Owls Strix aluco. Ibis 145: E59-E68.
3. Frumkin, R. 1994. Intraspecific brood-parasitism and dispersal in fledging Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. Ibis 136: 426-433.
4. Götmark, F. 2002. Predation by sparrowhawks favours early breeding and small broods in great tits. Oecologia 130: 25-32.
5. Jedrzejewski, W., Jedrzejewska, B., Szymura, A. & Zub, K. 1996. Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) predation in a pristine deciduous forest (Bialowieza National Park, Poland). J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 105-120.
6. Newton, I. 1998. Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press, London.
7. Overskaug, K., Bolstad, J.P., Sunde, P. & Øien, I.J. 1999. Fledgling behavior and survival in northern Tawny Owls. Condor 101: 169-174.
8. Petty, S.J. & Thirgood, S.J. 1989. A radio tracking study of post-fledging mortality and movements of Tawny Owls in Argyll. Ring. Migr. 10: 75-82
9. Petty, S.J., Appleby, B.M., Coles, C.F. & Juillard, R. 2004. The long-term effect of fitting back-mounted radio tags to juvenile Tawny Owls Strix aluco. Wildl. Biol. 10: 161-170.
10. Ranazzi, L., Manganaro, A. & Salvati, L. 2000. The breeding success of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco) in a Mediterranean area: a long-term study in urban Rome. J. Rapt. Res. 34: 322-326.
11. Southern, H.N. 1970. The natural control of a population of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco). J. Zool. Lond. 162: 197-285.
12. Southern, H.N., Vaughan, R. & Muir, R.C. 1954. The behaviour of young Tawny Owls after fledging. Bird Study 1: 101-110.
13. Sunde, P. & Bølstad, M.S. 2004. A telemetry study of the social organization of a Tawny Owl population. J. Zool. Lond., 263: 65-76.
14. Sunde, P., Bølstad, M.S. & Møller, J.D. 2003. Reversed sexual dimorphism in Tawny Owls, Strix aluco, correlates with duty division in breeding effort. Oikos 101: 265-278.
15. Wendland, V. 1984. The influence of prey fluctuations on the breeding success of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco. Ibis 126: 284-295.