|
Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 424-427
|
Comparison of the reliability of brain lesion localization when using traditional and stereotactic image-guided techniques: A prospective study
|
Author keywords
Computer assisted surgery; Neuronavigation; Stereotaxy
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
BRAIN CORTEX;
BRAIN DAMAGE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
IMAGING SYSTEM;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
NEUROIMAGING;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PHOTOGRAPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RELIABILITY;
SCALP;
STEREOTAXIS;
BRAIN DISEASE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
HISTOLOGY;
INSTRUMENTATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEURONAVIGATION;
NEUROSURGERY;
PATHOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
BRAIN DISEASES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEURONAVIGATION;
NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SCALP;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 27244455734
PISSN: 00223085
EISSN: 00223085
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0424 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (40)
|
References (5)
|