Development of the cone ERG in infants

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 3458-3462

  Hansen, Ronald M ^a   Fulton, Anne B ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; B WAVE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PHOTOTRANSDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA BIPOLAR GANGLION CELL; RETINA CONE; RETINA ROD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROBOSCOPE; STROBOSCOPY; TIME; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; CHILD; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; CHILD; CONES (RETINA); ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INFANT; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RODS (RETINA);

EID: 27244454673     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0382     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Hansen RM, Fulton A. The course of maturation of rod mediated visual thresholds in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1883-1885.
2. Mayer DL, Beiser AS, Warner AF, Pratt EM, Raye KN, Lang JM. Monocular acuity norms for the Teller acuity cards between ages 1 month and 4 years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:671-685.
3. Courage M, Adams R. Visual acuity assessment from birth to three years using the acuity card procedure: cross-sectional and longitudinal samples. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:713-718.
4. Salamao SR, Ventura DF. Large-sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech/Teller Acuity Cards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:657-670.
5. Hendrickson A, Yuodelis C. The morphological development of the human fovea. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:603-612.
6. Yuodelis C, Hendrickson AE. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human fovea during development. Vision Res. 1986;26:847-855.
7. Blakemore C. Maturation of mechanisms for efficient spatial vision. In: Blakemore C, ed. Vision: Coding and Efficiency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990:256-266.
8. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol. 1990;292:497-523.
9. Carter Dawson LD, LaVail MM. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. II. Autoradiographic analysis of cell generation using tritiated thymidine. J Comp Neurol. 1979;188:263-272.
10. Hendrickson AE. The morphologic development of human and monkey retina. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, eds. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Basic Sciences. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994:561-577.
11. Fulton AB, Hansen R, Westall CA. Development of ERG responses: the ISCEV rod, maximal and cone responses in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003;107:235-241.
12. Fulton AB, Hansen RM. The development of scotopic sensitivity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1588-1596.
13. Hood DC, Birch DG. Phototransduction in human cones measured using the a-wave of the ERG. Vision Res. 1995;35:2801-2810.
14. Hood DC, Birch DG. Rod phototransduction in retinitis pigmentosa: estimation and interpretation of parameters derived from the rod a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2948-2961.
15. Lamb T. Transduction in vertebrate photoreceptors: the roles of cyclic GMP and calcium. Trends Neurosci. 1986;9:224-228.
16. Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr. A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors. J Physiol (Lond). 1992;449:719-758.
17. Pugh EN Jr, Lamb TD. Phototransduction in vertebrate rods and cones: molecular mechanisms of amplification, recovery and light adaptation. In: Stavenga DG, de Grip WJ, Pugh EN Jr, eds. Molecular Mechanisms of Visual Transduction. New York: Elsevier Science; 2000:183-255.
18. Handbook of Biological Physics; vol 3.
19. Pugh ENJr, Lamb TD. Amplification and kinetics of the activation steps in phototransduction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1141:111-149.
20. Freidburg C, Allen CP, Mason PJ, Lamb TD. Contributions of cone photoreceptors and post-receptoral mechanisms to the human photopic electroretinogram. J Physiol (Lond). 2004;556:819-834.
21. Robson JG, Frishman LJ. Photoreceptor and bipolar cell contributions to the cat electroretinogram: a kinetic model for the early part of the flash response. J Opt Soc Am. 1996;13:613-622.
22. Bush RA, Sieving PA. A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:635-645.
23. Jamison JA, Bush RA, Lei B, Sieving PA. Characterization of the rod photoresponse isolated from the dark adapted primate ERG. Vis Neurosci. 2001;18:445-455.
24. Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG. An alternative phototransduction model for human rod and cone ERG a-waves: normal parameters and variation with age. Vision Res. 1996;36:2609-2621.
25. Hansen RM, Fulton AB. Development of scotopic retinal sensitivity. In: Simons K, ed. Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:130-142.
26. Hansen RM, Fulton AB. Psychophysical estimates of ocular media density of human infants. Vision Res. 1989;29:687-690.
27. Werner JS. Development of scotopic sensitivity and the absorption spectrum of the human ocular media. J Optic Soc Am. 1982;72:247-258.
28. Larsen JS. The sagittal growth of the eye. IV. Ultrasonic measurements of the axial length of the eye from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol. 1971;49:873-886.
29. Achiron R, Kreiser D, Achiron A. Axial growth of the fetal eye and evaluation of the hyaloid artery in utero ultrasonographic study. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20:894-899.
30. Denis D, Burguiere O, Burillon C. A biometric study of the eye, orbit and face in 205 normal human fetuses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2232-2238.
31. Brown AM, Dobson V, Maier J. Visual acuity of human infants at scotopic, mesopic and photopic luminances. Vision Res. 1987;27:1845-1858.
32. Hansen RM, Fulton AB, Harris SJ. Background adaptation in human infants. Vision Res. 1986;26:771-779.
33. Lachapelle P, Rufiange M, Dembinska O. A physiological basis for definition of the ISCEV ERG standard flash (SF) based on the photopic hill. Doc Ophthalmol. 2001;102:157-162.
34. Peachey NS, Alexander KR, Derlacki DJ, Fishman GA. Light adaptation and the luminance-response function of the cone electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;79:363-369.
35. Rufiange M, Rousseau S, Dembinska O, Lachapelle P. Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the photopic hill revisited. Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;104:231-248.
36. Rufiange M, Dassa J, Dembinska O et al. The photopic ERG luminance-response function (photopic hill): method of analysis and clinical application. Vision Res. 2003;43:1405-1412.
37. Ueno S, Kondo M, Yasurhiro N, Terasaki H, Miyake Y. Luminance dependence of neural components that underlies the primate photopic electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1033-1040.
38. Wall N, Leguire LE. The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;80:335-345.