Empirical versus trial set fitting systems for accelerated orthokeratology

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 137-147

  Maldonado Codina, Carole ^a   Efron, Suzanne ^a   Morgan, Philip ^a   Hough, Tony ^b   Efron, Nathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b CLS Software Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Corneal topography; Empirical; Orthokeratology; Reverse geometry; Rigid gas permeable contact lenses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMICROSCOPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTACT LENS; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; IRIS; KERATOMETRY; LENS; MALE; MYOPIA; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; STAINING; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CONTACT LENSES; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 27244443265     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000146170.27288.A3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mountford J. Orthokeratology. In: Contact Lenses. Phillips AJ, Speedwell L, eds. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997, pp 653-692.
2. Jessen GN. Orthofocus techniques. Contacto 1962;6:200-204.
3. Lui W-O, Edwards MH, Cho P. Contact lenses in myopia reduction: From Orthofocus to accelerated orthokeratology. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2000;23:68-76.
4. Mountford J. Advanced orthokeratology: Part 1: History, lens design and mode of action. Optician 2002;224(5862):20-25.
5. Barr JT. Orthokeratology and corneal refractive therapy: A review and recent findings. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29(1S):S49-S53.
6. Harris D, Stoyan N. A new approach to orthokeratology. Contact Lens Spectrum 1992;7:37-39.
7. Wlodga RJ, Harris D. Accelerated Orthokeratology. Techniques and Procedures Manual, Part 1. Chicago, National Eye Research Foundation, 1993, pp 1-7.
8. Tahhan N, du Toit R, Papas EB, et al. Comparison of reverse-geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80(12):796-804.
9. Buchner A, Faul F, Erdfelder E. GPOWER: A priori, post hoc and compromise power analyses for the Macintosh (computer program). Bonn, Bonn University, 1992.
10. Mountford J, Caroline P, Noack D. Corneal topography and orthokeratology: Pre-fitting evaluation. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:38-44.
11. Mountford J, Noack D. BE Optimal Orthokeratology v4.0. BE Enterprises QLD, 2001.
12. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, et al. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2000;(77):252-259.
13. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications (appendix A). In: Contact Lens Complications. Efron N, ed. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinnemann, 2004, pp 239-243.
14. Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000;21:17-29.
15. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, et al. Overnight orthokeratology: Preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) Study. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:598-605.
16. Lui W-O, Edwards MH. Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 2: Corneal topographic changes and safety over 100 days. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2000;23:90-99.
17. Mountford J. Analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. ICLC 1997;24:128-143.
18. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:791-799.
19. Sridharan R, Swarbrick HA. Corneal response to short-term orthokeratology lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:200-206.
20. Mountford J. Retention and regression of orthokeratology with time. Int Contact Lens Clin 1998;25:59-64.
21. Fonn D, Gauthier CA, Pritchard N. Patient preferences and comparative ocular response to rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:857-863.
22. Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Comfort response to rigid and soft hyper-transmissible contact lenses used for continuous wear. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29(1S):S127-S130.
23. Hough T, Edwards K. The reproducibility of videokeratoscope measurements as applied to the human cornea. Contact Lens Ant Eye 1999;22:91-99.