Nondisease genetic testing: Reporting of muscle SNPs shows effects on self-concept and health orientation scales

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1047-1054

  Gordon, Erynn S ^a   Gordish Dressman, Heather A ^a   Devaney, Joseph ^a   Clarkson, Priscilla ^b   Thompson, Paul ^c   Gordon, Paul ^d   Pescatello, Linda S ^e   Hubal, Monica J ^b   Pistilli, Emidio E ^d   Gianetti, Gary ^e   Kelsey, Bethany ^e   Hoffman, Eric P ^a  

^a CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c HARTFORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Health perception; Self concept; SNP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SELF CONCEPT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BIOMECHANICS; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSCLE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSCLES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 27244439978     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201449     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. www.genovations.com.
2. www.sciona.com.
3. www.docbluminc.com/imagene.htm.
4. www.signaturegenetics.com.
5. www.nugenix.com.
6. www.genetictechnologies.com/au.
7. Clow CL, Scriver CR: Knowledge about and attitudes toward genetic screening among high school students: the Tay Sachs experience. Pediatrics 1977; 59: 86-91.
8. Marteau TM, van Duijn M, Ellis I: Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study. J Med Genet 1992; 29: 24-26.
9. Woolridge EQ, Murray R: The health orientation scale: a measure of feeling about sickle cell trait. Soc Biol 1988; 35: 123-136.
10. Hampton ML, Anderson J, Lavizzo BS, Bergman AB: Sickle cell 'nondisease': a potentially serious public health problem. Am J Dis Child 1974; 128: 58-61.
11. Taylor CA, Myers R: Long-term impact of Huntington Disease linkage testing. Am J Med Genet 1997; 70: 365-370.
12. Reed T, Fabsitz RR, Selby JV, Carmelli D: Genetic influences and grip strength norms in the NHLBI twin study males aged 59-69. Ann Hum Biol 1991; 18: 425-432.
13. Arden NK, Spector TD: Genetic influences on muscle strength, lean body mass, and bone mineral density study. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 2076-2081.
14. Frederiksen H, Gaist D, Petersen HC et al: Hand grip strength: a phenotype suitable for idnetifying genetic variants affecting mid- and late- life physical functioning. Genet Epidemiol 2002; 23: 110-122.
15. Thomis MA, Beunen GP, Maes HH et al: Strength training: importance of genetic factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998a; 30: 724-731.
16. Thomis MA, Beunen GP, Van Leemputte M et al: Inheritance of static and dynamic arm strength and some of its determinants. Acta Physiol Scand 1998b; 163: 59-71.
17. Tiainen K, Sipila S, Alen M et al: Heritability of maximal isometric muscle strength in older female twins. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96: 173-180.
18. Thompson PD, Moyna N, Seip R et al: Functional polymorphisms associated with human muscle size and strength. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36 (7): 1132-1139.
19. Montgomery H, Clarkson P, Barnard M et al: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism and response to physical training. Lancet 1999; 353: 541-545.
20. Gayagay G, Yu B, Hambly B et al: Elite endurance athletes and the ACE I allele-the role of genes in athletic performance. Hum Genet 1998; 103: 48-50.
21. Roth SM, Schrager MA, Ferrell RE et al: CNTF genotype is associated with muscular strength and quality in humans across the adult age span. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 1205-1210.
22. Buemann B, Schierning B, Toubro S et al: The association between the val/ala-55 polymorphism of the uncoupling protein 2 gene and exercise efficiency. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 4467-4471.
23. Astrup A, Toubro S, Dalgaard LT et al: Impact of the v/v 55 polymorphism of the uncoupling protein 2 gene on 24-h energy expenditure and substrate oxidation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 1030-1040.
24. Clarkson PM, Devaney JM, Gordish-Dressman H et al: ACTN3 Genotype is Associated with Increases in Muscle Strength and Response to Resistance Training in Women. J Appl Physiol 2005, February 17 [E-pub ahead of print].
25. Fitts WH, Warren WL: Tennessee self-Concept Scale: Second Edition (TSCS:2). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1996.
26. Snell WE, Johnson G, Lloyd PJ, Hoover MW: The Health Orientation Scale: A measure of psychological tendencies associated with health. Eur J Personal 1991; 5: 169-183.
27. Hubal MJ, Gordish-Dressman H, Thompson PD et al: Variability in muscle size and strength gain following unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, in press.
28. Weiner B: A theory of motivation for some classroom experinces. J Educ Pyschol 1979; 71: 3-25.
29. Weiner B: An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev 1985; 92: 548-573.
30. Weiner B: Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct. New York: Guilford, 1995.
31. Overbay JD, Purath J: Self-concept and health status is elementary-school-aged children. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 1997; 20: 89-101.
32. Stein PN, Motta RW: Effects of aerobic and non-aerobic exercise on depression and self-concept. Percept Mot Skills 1992; 74: 79-89.
33. Ossip-Klein DJ, Boyne E, Bowman ED et al: Effects of running or weight lifting on self-concept in clinically depressed women. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57: 158-161.
34. Tucker LA: Effect of a weight-training program on the self-concepts of college males. Percept Mot Skills 1982; 54: 1055-1061.
35. DiLorenzo TM, Bargman EP, Stucky-Ropp R et al: Long-term effects of aerobic exercise on psychological outcomes. Prev Med 1999; 28: 75-85.
36. Rankinen T, Perusse L, Rauramaa R et al: The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2003 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1451-1469.
37. Plotnikoff RC, Brez S, Hotz SB: Exercise behavior in a community sample with diabetes: understanding determinants of exercise behavioral change. Diabetes Educ 2000; 26: 450-459.
38. Walcott-McQuigg JA: Psychological factors influencing cardiovascular risk reduction behaviour in low and middle income African American women. J Natl Black Nurses' Assoc 2000; 11: 27-35.
39. McCaleb A: Global and multidimensional self-concept as a predictor of health practices in middle adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 1995; 8: 18-26.
40. Macgregor ID, Regis D, Balding J: Self-concept and dental health behaviours in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 335-339.
41. Noakes TD: Tainted glory-doping and athletic performance. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 847-849.
42. Bjerklie D, Park A: How doctors help the dopers. Time 2004; 164: 58-62.
43. Henn W: Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 444-447.
44. Knoppers BM, Isasi RM: Regulatory Approaches to reproductive genetic testing. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2695-2701.
45. American Medical Association: Ethical issues related to prenatal genetic testing. The Council on ethical and judicial affairs. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 633-642.
46. William C, Alderson P, Farsides B: Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 743-753.
47. Murray TH: Assessing genetic technologies. Two ethical issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1994; 10: 573-582.