Information geometry of interspike intervals in spiking neurons

Neural Computation

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2719-2735

  Ikeda, Kazushi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURONS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); GEOMETRY;

CORTICAL AREAS; GAMMA PROCESS; GEOMETRICAL METHODS; INFORMATION GEOMETRY; INTER SPIKE INTERVALS; SEMIPARAMETRIC; SHAPE PARAMETERS; SPIKE SEQUENCES; SPIKING NEURONES; TIME VARIANT;

NEURONS;

EID: 27144528717     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089976605774320593     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amari, S.-I. (1985). Differential-geometrical methods in statistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2. Amari, S.-I. (2001). Information geometry on hierarchy of probability distributions. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 47(5), 1701-1711.
3. Amari, S.-I., & Han, T. S. (1989). Statistical inference under multiterminal rate restrictions: A differential geometric approach. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 35(2), 217-227.
4. Amari, S.-I., & Kawanabe, M. (1997). Information geometry of estimating functions in semiparametric statistical models. Bernoulli, 1(3), 29-54.
5. Amari, S.-I., & Nagaoka, H. (2000). Information geometry. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Godambe, V. P. (1976). Conditional likelihood and unconditional optimum estimating equations. Biometrika, 63, 277-284.
7. Godambe, V. P. (Ed.). (1991). Estimating functions. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Holt, G. R., Softky, W. R., Koch, C., & Douglas, R. J. (1996). Comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in vivo in cat visual cortex neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 1806-1814.
9. Miura, K., Shinomoto, S., & Okada, M. (2004). Search for optimal measure to discriminate random and regular spike trains (Tech. Rep. No. NC2004-52). Tokyo: IEICE. [in Japanese].
10. Murata, T., Matsui, N., Miyauchi, S., Kakita, Y., & Yanagida, T. (2003). Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry. Neuroreport, 14(10), 1347-1352.
11. Sakai, Y., Funahashi, S., & Shinomoto, S. (1999). Temporally correlated inputs to leaky integrate-and-fire models can reproduce spiking statistics of cortical neurons. Neural Networks, 12, 1181-1190.
12. Shinomoto, S., Sakai, Y., & Funahashi, S. (1999). The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process does not reproduce spiking statistics of neurons in prefrontal cortex. Neural Computation, 11, 935-951.
13. Shinomoto, S., Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (2002). New classification scheme of cortical sites with the neuronal spiking characteristics. Neural Networks, 15(10), 1165-1169.
14. Shinomoto, S., Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (2003). Differences in spiking patterns among cortical neurons. Neural Computation, 15(12), 2823-2842.
15. Shinomoto, S., & Tsubo, Y. (2001). Modeling spiking behavior of neurons with time-dependent Poisson processes. Physical Review E, 64, 041910.
16. Tiesinga, P. H. E., Fellous, J. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Attractor reliability reveals deterministic structure in neuronal spike trains. Neural Computation, 14, 1629-1650.