Writing to Inquire: Written Products as Performance Measures

Assessing Science Understanding

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 223-247

  Champagne, Audrey B ^a   Kouba, Vicky L ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144505879     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012498365-6/50012-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science The liberal art of science: Agenda for action 1990, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science Benchmarks for science literacy 1993, Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
3. Bourque M.L., Champagne A.B., Crissman S. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1996 science performance standards: Achievement results for the nation and the states 1997, National Assessment Governing Board, Washington DC.
4. Britton J. Language and learning 1970, The Penguin Press, London.
5. Britton J., Burgess T., Martin N., McLeod A., Rosen H. The development of writing abilities 1975, 11-18, Macmillan Education, London.
6. Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 1989, (18):32-42. 1.
7. Bybee R.W. Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices 1997, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
8. Candace J., Duckworth E. A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning science. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice 1996, 55-72. Teacher College Press, New York. C. T. Fosnot (Ed.).
9. Champagne A.B. Assessment and science curriculum design. National Standards and the Science Curriculum: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations 1996, 75-82. Colorado Springs, CO, BSCS. R. W. Bybee (Ed.).
10. Champagne A.B., Kouba V.L., Hurley M. Assessing inquiry. Examining Inquiry in science teaching and learning 1999, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC. J. Minstral, E. van der Zee (Eds.).
11. Chi ML, Bassik M., Lewis M., Glaser R. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 1989, (13):145-182.
12. Cohen M.R., Nagel E. An introduction to logic and scientific method. Writing to learn mathematics and science 1934, Harcourt, Brace. P. Connoly, T. Vilardi, (Eds.).
13. 1989, Teachers College Press, New York.
14. Cox J.R., Willard C.A. Advances in argumentation: Theory and research 1982, Southern Illinois University Press.
15. American Forensic Association 1982, Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Crawford K. Cultural process and learning: Expectations, actions, and outcomes. Theories of mathematical learning 1996, 131-148. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S. L.P., N. P. (Eds.).
17. Dewey J. How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process 1933, D. C. Heath, Boston.
18. Duit R. The constructivist view: A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice. Constructivism in education 1995, 271-286. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NI. L. P. Steffe, G. J. (Eds.).
19. Frank Phillip Philosophy of Science: The Link Between Science, and Philosophy. A Spectrum Book 1957, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Gergen K.J. Social construction and the educational process. Constructivism in education 1995, 17-40. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L. P. Steffe, J. Gale (Eds.).
21. Giere R.N. Explaining science: A cognitive approach 1988, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
22. Halliday M.A.K., Martin J.R. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power 1993, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
23. Hildebrand G.M. Disrupting hegemonic writing practices in school science: Contesting the right way to write. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1998, 35(4):345-362.
24. Keiser K.K., Nelson J.E., Norris N.A., Szyszkiewicz S. NAEP 1996 science: Crossstate data compendium for the grade 8 assessment 1998, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
25. Knorr K.D., Kron R., Whitley R. The social process of scientific investigation 1981, D. Reidel., Boston.
26. Kouba V.L., Champagne A.B. Literacy components in natural science and mathematics standards documents: Communication and reasoning 1998, National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement, Albany, NY.
27. Kuhn D. The skills of argument 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Kuhn D. Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review 1992, 62(2):155-178.
29. Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions 1962, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. Lakatos I., Musgrave A. Criticism and the growth of knowledge 1970, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31. Latour B. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society 1987, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
33. McQuade T.F Proposition analysis: A curriculum to teach high school students how to organize essays. Doctoral Dissertation 1983, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
34. Teaching science for understanding 1996, Academic Press, Orlando, FL. J.J. Mintzes, J.H. Wandersee, J.D. Novak (Eds.).
35. Myers G. Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge 1990, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
36. National Research Council On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research 1995, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 2nd ed.
37. National Research Council. National science education standards 1996, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
38. Neill, M., Bursh, P., Schaeffer, B., Thrall, C., Yohe, M., & Zappardino, P. (Undated). Implementing performance assessments: A guide to classroom, school and.
39. Penrose A.M., Katz S.B. Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse 1998, St. Martin's Press, New York.
40. Popper K.R. Conjectures and refutations 1965, Harper & Row, New York.
41. Distributed cognitions 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York. G. Salomon (Ed.).
42. Shavelson R.J., Baxter G.P., Pine J. Performance assessments; political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher 1992, 22-27.
43. Spivey N.N. The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning 1997, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
44. Thinking and problem solving 1994, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. R.J. Sternberg (Ed.).
45. Toulmin S.E. Human understanding 1972, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
46. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Vygotsky L.S. Thought and language 1986, Revised Edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. A. Kozulin (Ed.).
48. Walbesser H. Science: a process approach: An evaluation model and its application 1968, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Commission on Science Education, Washington, DC.
49. Whitehead A.N. Science and the modern world 1925, New American Library, The MacMillian Company, New York.