Comparison of automated microbroth dilution and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from dairy sources

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 686-691

  Halbert, Lisa W ^a   Kaneene, John B ^a   Mansfield, Linda S ^a   Ruegg, Pamela L ^b   Warnick, Lorin D ^c   Wells, Scott J ^d   Fossler, Chuck P ^e   Campbell, Amy M ^a   Geiger Zwald, Angela M ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e CENTERS FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ANIMAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibiotic resistance; C. jejuni; Epidemiological surveillance

Indexed keywords

AGAR; CIPROFLOXACIN; ERYTHROMYCIN; NALIDIXIC ACID; TETRACYCLINE;

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DAIRY CATTLE; DILUTION; DRUG POTENTIATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

AMPICILLIN; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; AUTOMATION; CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI; CATTLE; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; ERYTHROMYCIN; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; NALIDIXIC ACID; TETRACYCLINE;

EID: 27144502010     PISSN: 03057453     EISSN: 14602091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki309     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Altekruse SF, Swerdlow DL, Stern NJ. Campylobacter jejuni. In: Tollefson L, ed. The Veterinary Clinics of North America, Food Animal Practice: Microbial Food Borne Pathogens. Philadelphia, PA, USA: W. B. Saunders Company, 1998; 31-40.
2. Allos MB. Campylobacter jejuni infections: Update on emerging issues and trends. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 1201-6.
3. Blaser MJ. Epidemiologic and clinical features of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Infect Dis 1997; 176: S103-5.
4. Rees JH, Soudain SE, Gregson NA et al. Campylobacter jejuni infection and Guillain-Barre syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1374-9.
5. Nachamkin I, Allos BM, Ho T. Campylobacter species and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 555-67.
6. Manser PA, Dalziel RW. A survey of Campylobacter in animals. J Hyg 1985; 95: 15-21.
7. Petersen L, Nielsen EM, Engberg J et al. Comparison of genotypes and serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from Danish wild mammals and birds and from broiler flocks and humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 76: 3115-21.
8. Jacob-Reitsma W. Campylobacter in the food supply. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser M, eds. Campylobacter, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2000; 467-81.
9. Kramer JM, Frost JA, Bolton FJ et al. Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: Identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. J Food Prot 2000; 63: 1654-9.
10. Luo N, Sahin O, Lin J et al. In vivo selection of Campylobacter isolates with high levels of fluoroquinolone resistance associated with gyrA mutations and the function of the CmeABC efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 390-4.
11. McDermott PF, Bodeis SM, English LL et al. Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni evolves rapidly in chickens treated with fluoroquinolones. J Infect Dis 2002; 185: 837-40.
12. Moore JE, McLernon P, Wareing D et al. Characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistance Campylobacter species isolated from human being and chickens. Vet Rec 2002; 150: 518-20.
13. Aarestrup FM, Nielsen EM, Madsen M et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from humans, pigs, cattle, and broilers in Denmark. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41: 2233-50.
14. Neu HC. The crisis in antibiotic resistance. Science 1992; 257: 1064-73.
15. Padungtod P, Kaneene JB. Campylobacter spp. in human, chickens, pigs and their antimicrobial resistance. J Vet Med Sci 2003; 65: 161-70.
16. Saenz Y, Zarazaga M, Lantero M et al. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from animals, foods, and humans in Spain 1997-1998. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 267-71.
17. Threlfall EJ, Ward LR, Frost JA et al. The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance in food-borne bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 2000; 62: 1-5.
18. VanDenBogaard AE. Antimicrobial resistance-relation to human and animal exposure to antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 40: 453-4.
19. Piddock LJ, Ricci V, Pumbwe L et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter species from man and animals: Detection of topoisomerase genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51: 19-26.
20. Correy JE, Post DE, Colin P et al. Culture media for the isolation of Campylobacters. Int J Food Microbiol 1995; 26: 43-76.
21. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard 23. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA, 2003.
22. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. MIC Testing Supplemental Tables: Approved Standard M100. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA, 2003.
23. Cabrita J, Rodrigues J, Braganca F et al. Prevalence, biotypes, plasmid profile and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolated from wild and domestic animals from northeast Portugal. J Appl Bacteriol 1992; 73: 279-85.
24. Aquino MH, Filgueiras AL, Ferreira MC et al. Antimicrobial resistance and plasmid profiles of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from human and animal sources. Lett Appl Microbiol 2002; 34: 149-53.
25. NARMS. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System: Enteric Bacteria-2000 Annual Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
26. Luber P, Bartelt E, Genschow E et al. Comparison of broth microdilution, e test, and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 1062-8.
27. Green AM. Patterns of occurrence of Campylobacter in organic and conventional dairy farms in Midwestern and Northeastern United States (MS thesis). East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University, 2002.
28. Zwald A, Ruegg P, Kaneene J et al. Management practices and reported antimicrobial usage on conventional and organic dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 191-201.
29. Ge B, Bodeis S, Walker RD et al. Comparison of the E-test and agar dilution for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 50: 487-94.
30. Barry AL, Braun LE. Reader error in determining minimal inhibitory concentrations with microdilution susceptibility test panels. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 13: 228-30.
31. Halbert LW. Patterns of reduced antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter isolated from organic and conventional dairy farms in the Midwestern and northeastern United States (PhD dissertation). East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University, 2004.
32. Denton JH. Performance standards for Campylobacter are not warranted. Food Tech 2002; 56: 104.
33. Hakanen A, Kotilainen P, Siitonen A et al. Quality control strains used in susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 2705-6.
34. Hanson RA. The development of standardized in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Campylobacter spp. (MS thesis). East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University, 2002.
35. Wallace FM, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Evaluation of three different methods for antimicrobial susceptibility screening of Campylobacter. In: General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Los Angeles, CA, 2000. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.
36. Oncul O, Zarakolu P, Oncul O et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni: A comparison between E-test and agar dilution method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 45:69-71.