Non-markovian transport of DNA in microfluidic post arrays

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 19, 2005, Pages

  Minc, Nicolas ^a   Viovy, Jean Louis ^a   Dorfman, Kevin D ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA VELOCITY; MAGNETIC BEADS; MICROFLUIDIC POST ARRAYS; SOLVABLE MODEL;

ARRAYS; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

DNA;

VIRUS DNA;

CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; ENTEROBACTERIA PHAGE T4; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROFLUIDICS; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES; THERMODYNAMICS;

BACTERIOPHAGE T4; DNA, VIRAL; MARKOV CHAINS; MICROFLUIDICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 27144498980     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.198105     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. P.S. Doyle, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 295, 2237 (2002). 10.1126/science.1068420
2. N. Minc, Anal. Chem. ANCHAM 0003-2700 76, 3770 (2004). 10.1021/ac035246b
3. N. Kaji, Anal. Chem. ANCHAM 0003-2700 76, 15 (2004). 10.1021/ac030303m
4. N. Minc, Electrophoresis 26, 362 (2005). ELCTDN 0173-0835 10.1002/elps.200410115
5. W.D. Volkmuth and R.H. Austin, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 358, 600 (1992). 10.1038/358600a0
6. W.D. Volkmuth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2117 (1994). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2117
7. G.C. Randall and P.S. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 058102 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.058102
8. G.I. Nixon and G.W. Slater, Phys. Rev. E 50, 5033 (1994). PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.5033
9. E.M. Sevick and D.R.M. Williams, Phys. Rev. E 50, R3357 (1994); PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.R3357
10. E.M. Sevick and D.R.M. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2595 (1996); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2595
11. P. André, D. Long, and A. Ajdari, Eur. Phys. J. B 4, 307 (1998). EPJBFY 1434-6028
12. P.M. Saville and E.M. Sevick, Macromolecules 32, 892 (1999). MAMOBX 0024-9297 10.1021/ma981049g
13. P.D. Patel and E.S.G. Shaqfeh, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 2941 (2003). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1532729
14. K.D. Dorfman and J.-L. Viovy, Phys. Rev. E 69, 011901 (2004). PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.011901
15. J.M. Deutsch, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 7436 (1989). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.456223
16. S. Popelka, J. Chromatogr., A JCRAEY 0021-9673 838, 45 (1999). 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00165-X
17. Krawczyk, attempted a similar extension of geometration by introducing a phenomenological coefficient for the mean distance between collisions. However, they assumed that the dispersion is the sum of that from the random cycle time and a Poisson-distributed number of collisions, rather than rigorously accounting for the nonseparability of the walk.
18. Different distributions could be chosen, such as a Gaussian one, albeit at the expense of complicating the ensuing analysis.
19. S.B. Smith, L. Finzi, and C. Bustamante, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 258, 1122 (1992);
20. T.T. Perkins, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 268, 83 (1995);
21. O.B. Bakajin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2737 (1998). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2737
22. M. Kenward and G.W. Slater, Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 55 (2004). EPJSFH 1292-8941 10.1140/epje/i2004-10006-4
23. For comparison with Ephesia data, we use μ0=2.5×10-4cm2/Vs. The lc are estimated using the λ-DNA lc of 16.3μm as a baseline, adjusting for the number of base pairs, and then increasing lc by 25% to account for elongation by YOYO-1.
24. H. Scher and M. Lax, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 0556-2805 7, 4491 (1973). 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.4491
25. B.H. Hughes, Random Walks in Random Environments (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
26. J.C. Giddings Unified Separation Science (Wiley, New York, 1991).
27. G.H. Weiss and R.J. Rubin, Adv. Chem. Phys. 52, 363 (1983). ADCPAA 0065-2385
28. M.J. Krawczyk, J. Dulak, and K. Kułakowski, Electrophoresis 23, 182 (2002). ELCTDN 0173-0835 10.1002/1522-2683(200202)23:2<182::AID- ELPS182>3.0.CO;2-D