Acceptability of human papillomavirus self testing in female adolescents

Sexually Transmitted Infections

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 408-414

  Kahn, Jessica A ^a   Bernstein, D I ^b   Rosenthal, S L ^c   Huang, B ^a,b   Kollar, L M ^a   Colyer, J L ^d   Tissot, A M ^a,e   Hillard, P A ^a   Witte, D ^b   Groen, P ^b   Slap, G B ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CCHMC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VIRUS DNA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DETERMINATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; VIRUS INFECTION; WART VIRUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SELF CARE; SPECIMEN HANDLING; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 27144493735     PISSN: 13684973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2004.012047     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ho GY, Bierman R, Beardsley L, et al. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med 1998;338:423-8.
2. Kulasingam SL, Hughes JP, Kiviat NB, et al. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral. JAMA 2002;288:1749-57.
3. Nobbenhuis MA, Walboomers JM, Heimerhorst TJ, et al. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:20-5.
4. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-19.
5. Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810-19.
6. Kim JJ, Wright TC, Goldie SJ. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. JAMA 2002;287:2382-90.
7. Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Broering J, et al. The natural history of human papillomavirus infection as measured by repeated DNA testing in adolescent and young women. J Pediatr 1998;132:277-84.
8. Moscicki AB, Hills NK, Shiboski S. High rate of regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in adolescents. Presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD, 4 May, 2002.
9. Manos MM, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. JAMA 1999;281:1605-10.
10. Cox JT. Evaluating the role of HPV testing for women with equivocal Papanicolaou test findings. JAMA 1999;281:1645-47.
11. The ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1383-92.
12. Wright TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120-9.
13. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:295-304.
14. Harper DM, Noll WW, Belloni DR, et al. Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed-biologic condordance and women's preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:365-73.
15. Kahn JA, Slap GB, Huang B, et al. Comparison of adolescent and young adult self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:952-9.
16. Dannecker C, Siebert U, Thaler CJ, et al. Primary cervical cancer screening by self-sampling of human papillomavirus DNA in internal medicine outpatient clinics. Ann Oncol 2004;15:863-69.
17. Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Huttemann U, et al. Screening for cervical neoplasia by self-assessment for human papillomavirus DNA. Lancet 1999;354:1970.
18. Sellors JW, Lorincz AT, Mahony JB, et al. Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. CMAJ 2000;163:513-18.
19. Dzuba IG, Diaz EY, Allen B, et al. The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the Pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine 2002;11:265-74.
20. Smith K, Harrington K, Wingood G, et al. Self-obtained vaginal swabs for diagnosis of treatable sexually transmitted diseases in adolescent girls. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:676-9.
21. Holland-Hall CM, Wiesenfeld HC, Murray PJ. Self-collected vaginal swabs for the detection of multiple sexually transmitted infections in adolescent girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2002;15:307-13.
22. Serlin M, Shafer MA, Tebb K, et al. What sexually transmitted disease screening method does the adolescent prefer? Adolescents' attitudes toward first-void urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and pelvic examination. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:588-91.
23. Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Hamann T, et al. Attitudes about human papillomavirus vaccine in young women. Int J STD AIDS 2003;14:300-6.
24. Kahn JA, Goodman E, Huang B, et al. Predictors of Papanicolaou smear return in a hospital-based adolescent and young adult clinic. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:490-9.
25. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1991.
26. McDonald RP. Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985.
27. Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effects of sample size. Psychol Bull 1988;103:305-12.
28. Benrler PM. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;88:588-606.
29. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.
30. Forrest S, McCaffery K, Waller J, et al. Attitudes to self-sampling for HPV among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in Manchester, UK. J Med Screen 2004;11:85-8.
31. Hsieh YH, Howell MR, Gaydos JC, et al. Preference among female army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Sex Transm Dis 2003;30:769-73.
32. Hughes C, Lerman C, Lustbader E. Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;40:25-35.
33. Paskett ED, Rushing J, D'Agostino R Jr, et al. Cancer screening behaviors of low-income women: the impact of race. Women's Health 1997;3:203-26.
34. Barroso J, McMillan S, Casey L, et al. Comparison between African-American and white women in their beliefs about breast cancer and their health locus of control. Cancer Nurs 2000;23:268-76.
35. Wiesenfeld HC, Lowry DL, Heine RP, et al. Self-collection of vaginal swabs for the detection of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis: opportunity to encourage sexually transmitted disease testing among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis 2001;28:321-5.
36. Richardson E, Sellors JW, Mackinnon S, et al. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and specimen collection preference among women, using self-collected vaginal swabs in community settings. Sex Transm Dis 2003;30:880-5.
37. Mays R, Zimet GD, Winston Y, ef al. Human papillomavirus, genital warts, Pap smears, and cervical cancer: knowledge and beliefs of adolescent and adult women. Health Care Women Int 2000;21:361-74.
38. Shafer MB. Annual pelvic examination in the sexually active adolescent female: what are we doing and why are we doing it? J Adolesc Health 1998;23:68-73.
39. Blake DR, Duggan A, Quinn T, et al. Evaluation of vaginal infections in adolescent women: can it be done without a speculum? Pediatrics 1998;102:939-44.
40. Shafer MA. With urine-based screening, do sexually active adolescent girls still need annual pelvic examinations? No: recommending annual exams is not evidence based, West J Med 2000;173:293.
41. Williams GC, Cox EM, Kouides R, et al. Presenting the facts about smoking to adolescents: effects of an autonomy-supportive style. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:959-64.
42. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68-78.