Forcing neurocontrollers to exploit sensory symmetry through hard-wired modularity in the game of Cellz

IEEE 2005 Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG'05

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 37-43

  Togelius, Julian ^a   Lucas, Simon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING SCHEMES; ENCODINGS; EVOLVABLE SYSTEMS; EVOLVING SYSTEMS; FUNCTION APPROXIMATION; MONOLITHIC CONTROLLERS; NEURO CONTROLLERS; SIMPLE GAMES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); GAME THEORY;

TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

EID: 27144487901     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bongard, J. C. (2003): Incremental Approaches to the Combined Evolution of a Robot's Body and Brain. PhD dissertation, University of Zurich.
2. Bullinaria, J. A. (2002): To Modularize or Not To Modularize? Proceedings of the 2002 U.K Workshop on Computational Intelligence: UKCI-02.
3. Calabretta, R., Nolfi, S., Parisi, D., Wagner, G. P. (2000): Duplication of modules facilitates functional specialization. Artificial Life, 6(1), 69-84.
4. Calabretta, R, Di Ferdinando, A. D., Wagner, G. P., Parisi, D. (2003): What does it to take to evolve behaviorally complex organisms? Biosystems 69(2-3): 245-62. (Pubitemid 36411744)
5. Gruau, F. (1993): Genetic Synthesis of Modular Neural Networks. In Forrest, S. (Ed.): Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 318-325.
6. Hornby, G. S., Lipson, H., Pollack, J. B. (2001): Evolution of Generative Design Systems for Modular Physical Robots. IEEE International Conference of Robotics and Automation.
7. M. Keijzer, J. J. Merelo, G. Romero, and M. Schoenauer, (2001) Evolving Objects: a general purpose evolutionary computation library, Proceedings of Evolution Artificielle. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2310, 231-244.
8. Kodjabachian, J. and Meyer, J. A. (1995): Evolution and development of control architectures in animats. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 16, 161-182.
9. Koza, J. R. (1994): Genetic Programming II: Automatic Discovery of Reusable Programs. Bradford Books.
10. Lindenmayer, A. (1968): Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development: Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 18, 280-299, 300-315.
11. Lucas, S. M. (2004): Cellz: A Simple Dynamic Game for Testing Evolutionary Algorithms. Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1007-1014.
12. Lucas, S.M. (2004), Exploiting Reflection in Object Oriented Genetic Programming, Proceedings of the European Conference on Genetic Programming, 369-378.
13. Schraudolph, N. N., Dayan, P., Sejnowski, T. J. (1993): Temporal Difference Learning of Position Evaluation in the Game of Go. In Cowan et al. (eds): Advances in Neural Information Processing 6. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 817 - 824.
14. Stanley, K. O. and Miikkulainen, R. (2003): A Taxonomy for Artificial Embryogeny. Artificial Life, 9(2), 93-138.
15. Togelius, J. (2004): Evolution of a subsumption architecture neurocontroller. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 15(1), 15-20. (Pubitemid 39607160)
16. Vaughan, E. (2003): Bilaterally symmetric segmented neural networks for multi-jointed arm articulation. Unpublished paper, University of Sussex. Available at: http://www.droidlogic.com/sussex/adaptivesystems/Arm.pdf.