Cognitive control can modulate intersensory facilitation: speeding up visual antisaccades with an auditory distractor

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 166, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 440-444

  Kirchner, Holle ^a,b   Colonius, Hans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

Author keywords

Antisaccades; Interstimulus contingencies; Multisensory interaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HEARING; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SENSORY STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADES;

EID: 27144486111     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2383-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Colonius H, Arndt P (2001) A two-stage model for visual-auditory interaction in saccadic latencies. Percept Psychophys 63:126-147
2. Corneil BD, Munoz DP (1996) The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts. J Neurosci 16:8193-8207
3. Everling S, Fischer B (1998) The antisaccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies. Neuropsychologia 36:885-899
4. Fecteau JH, Au C, Armstrong IT, Munoz DP (2004) Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 159:84-91
5. Frens MA, Van Opstal AJ, Van der Willigen RF (1995) Spatial and temporal factors determine auditory-visual interactions in human saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57:802-816
6. Groh JM, Trause AS, Underhill AM, Clark KR, Inati S (2001) Eye position influences auditory responses in primate inferior colliculus. Neuron 29:509-518
7. Hunt AR, Olk B, von Muhlenen A, Kingstone A (2004) Integration of competing saccade programs. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 19:206-208
8. Kirchner H, Colonius H (2004) Predictiveness of a visual distractor modulates saccadic responses to auditory targets. Exp Brain Res 155:257-260
9. Kristjánsson A, Chen Y, Nakayama K (2001) Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades. Nat Neurosci 4:1037-1042
10. Kristjánsson A, Vandenbroucke MW, Driver J (2004) When pros become cons for anti-versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types. Exp Brain Res 155:231-244
11. Kveraga K, Boucher L, Hughes HC (2002) Saccades operate in violation of Hick's law. Exp Brain Res 146:307-314
12. Lueck CJ, Crawford TJ, Savage CJ, Kennard C (1990) Auditory-visual interaction in the generation of saccades in man. Exp Brain Res 82:149-157
13. Massen C (2004) Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task. Q J Exp Psychol A 57:475-498
14. Olk B, Kingstone A (2003) Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. Neuroreport 14:151-155
15. Ross SM, Ross LE (1981) Saccade latency and warning signals: effects of auditory and visual stimulus onset and offset. Percept Psychophys 29:429-437
16. Schall JD (2004) On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades. Vis Res 44:1453-1467
17. Shore D, Simic N (this issue) Visuotactile congruency is unaffected by probability of congruency: support for a sensory locus of integration
18. Wallace MT, Roberson GE, Hairston WD, Stein BE, Vaughan JW, Schirillo JA (2004) Unifying multisensory signals across time and space. Exp Brain Res 158:252-258