Accelerated enterprise process modeling through a formalized functional typology

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3649, Issue , 2005, Pages 446-451

  Wasser, Avi ^a   Lincoln, Maya ^a   Karni, Reuven ^a  

^a ProcessGene Ltd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS CONTROL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

BUSINESS PROCESSES; CUSTOMIZATION; ENTERPRISE PROCESS MODELING; PROCESS MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 27144484982     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11538394_38     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. W.M.P. van der Aalst. Three Good Reasons for Using a Petri-net-based Workflow Management System. In S. Navathe and T. Wakayama, editors, Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Information and Process Integration in Enterprises (IPIC'96), pages 179-201, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Nov 1996.
2. G. K. Janssens, J. Vereist, B. Weyn. Techniques for Modeling Workflows and their Support of Reuse. In In W.M.P. van der Aalst, J. Desel, and A. Oberweis, editors, Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, volume 1806 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1-15. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
3. Intentia Reference Models, http://www.intentia.com/WCW.nsf/pub/ tools_index, 2004.
4. D. Karagiannis, H. Kühn. MetaModeling Platforms. In: K. Bauknecht; A. Min Tjoa, G. Quirchmayer, Editors, Proceedings of the Third International Conference EC-Web 2002, volume 2455 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 182. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002. (full version in http://www.dke.univie.ac. at).
5. B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Fundamentals of Control Flow in Workflows (Revised version). QUT Technical report, FIT-TR-2002-03, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2002. (Also see http://www.tm.tue.nl/it/research/patterns).
6. T. W. Malone, K. Crowston, J. Lee, B. Pentland, C. Dellarocas, G. Wyner, J. Quimby, C. S. Osborn, A. Bernstein, G. Herman, M. Klein, and E. O'Donnell. Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes. Management Science 45(3) pages 425-443, March, 1999.
7. T. W. Malone, The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style, and Your Life. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
8. OAGIS. Best Practices and XML Content for Everywhere-to-Everywhere Integration, http://www.openapplications.org/, 2004.
9. Oracle. Business Models (OBM), http://www.orack.com/consulting/offerings/ implementation/methods_tools/, 2004.
10. Rosettanet. Lingua Franca for Business, http://www.rosettanet.org/, 2004.
11. A.W. Scheer, M. Nüttgens. ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management. In W.M.P. van der Aalst, J. Desel, and A. Oberweis, editors, Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, volume 1806 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 376-390. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
12. SAP. Business Maps and Solution Composer, http://www.sap.com/solutions/ businessmaps/composer/, 2004.
13. G. Yang. Towards a Library for Process Programming. In W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and M. Weske, editors, BPM 2003, volume 2678 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 120-135. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
14. C.P. Holland, B. Light, A critical success factors model for ERP implementations, IEEE Software 16 (1999) 30-35.
15. B. Light, The maintenance implications of the customization of ERP software, J. Software Maintenance: Res. Practice 13 (2001) 415-429.
16. M. Krumbholz, N. Maiden, The implementation of enterprise resource planning packages in different organizational and national cultures, Inf. Systems 26 (2001) 185-204.
17. J. Ghosh, SAP Project Management, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000. Eng. 41 (2000) 180-193.