Fee hunting pheasants in Colorado: Experimental evidence

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 51-59

  Remington, Thomas E ^a   Manfredo, Michael J ^b   Vaske, Jerry J ^b   DeMasso, Suzanne M ^b  

^a Colorado Division of Wildlife ^*  (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Fee hunting; Pheasants

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144483579     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209609359051     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adams, R.M., Bergland, O., Musser, W.N., Johnson, S.L., & Musser, L.M. (1989). User fees and equity issues in public hunting expenditures: The case of ring-necked pheasant in Oregon. Land Economics, 65, 376-385.
2. Bishop, R. C. (1981). Economic considerations affecting landowner behavior. In R. T. Dumke, G. V. Burger, & J. R. March (Eds.), Wildlife management on private lands (pp. 73-87). Madison: Wisconsin Chapter of the Wildlife Society.
3. Bishop, R.C., & Heberlein, T.A. (1979). Measuring values of extra market goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926-930.
4. Bishop, R.C., & Heberlein, T.A. (1986). Does contingent valuation work. In R.G. Cummings, D.S. Brookshire, & W.D. Schulze (Eds.), Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
5. Bishop, R.C., Heberlein, T.A., & Kealy, M.J. (1983). Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market. Natural Resources Journal, 23, 619-633.
6. Braun, C.E., Giesen, K.M., Hoffman, R.W., Remington, T.E., & Snyder, W.D. (1994). Upland bird management analysis guide. Denver, CO: Colorado Division of Wildlife.
7. Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S., & Schulze, W.D. (Eds.). (1986). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
8. Decker, D.J., Enck, J.W., & Brown, T.L. (1993). The future of hunting—will we pass on the heritage? Proceedings of the Governor’s Symposium on North America’s Hunting Heritage, 2, 22-46.
9. Enck, J. W., Swift, B.L., & Decker, D. J. (1993). Reasons for declines in duck hunting: Insights from New York. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21, 10-21.
10. Farris, A. L., & Cole, S. H. (1981). Strategies and goals for wildlife habitat restoration on private agricultural lands. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 46, 130-135.
11. Fisher, W. L. (1984). Measuring the economic value of fishing and hunting: A conceptual overview. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Omicron delta epsilon. Lycoming, College, Williams, PA., April 16.
12. Matulich, G. C., & Bagwell, G. (1979). On-farm pheasant enhancement potentials in irrigated agriculture. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4, 99-109.
13. Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
14. Pierce, C.L., Manfredo, M.J., & Sikorowski, L. (1994). Workshopon enhancing recreational opportunities in small game and waterfowl hunting. Project Rep. for the CO Division of Wildlife. (Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit Rep. No. 19.) Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.
15. Rasker, R. (1989). Agriculture and wildlife: An economic analysis of waterfowl habitat management on farms in western Oregon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
16. Rounds, R.C. (1975). Public access to private lands for hunting. (Colorado Division of Wildlife Spec. Rep. No. 2). Denver, CO.
17. Samples, K.C., Dixon, J.A., & Gowen, M.M. (1986). Information disclosures and endangered species valuation. Land Economics, 62, 306-312.
18. Shultz, S.D., & Luloff, A.E. (1990). The threat of nonresponse bias to survey research. Journal of the Community Development Society, 21, 104-116.
19. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993). Statistical abstract of the United States: 113th Ed. Washington D.C.