Mesh decomposition using motion information from animation sequences

Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 519-529

  Lee, Tong Yee ^a,b   Lin, Ping Hsien ^c   Yon, Shaur Uei ^d   Lin, Chun Hao ^d  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b IEEE   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^d National Changhua University of Education ^*

Author keywords

Compression; Mesh decomposition; Motion complexity; Motion similarity; PCA

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSION; MESH DECOMPOSITION; MOTION COMPLEXITY; MOTION SIMILARITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMATION; DATA COMPRESSION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

MOTION ESTIMATION;

EID: 27144455768     PISSN: 15464261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cav.79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Levy B, Petitjean S, Ray N, Mallot J. Least squares conformal maps for auto-matic texture atlas generation. In SIGGRAPH'02 Proceedings, 2002; pp. 362-371.
2. Sander P, Wood Z, Gortler S, Snyder J, Hoppe H. Multi-chart geometry images. In Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, 2003; pp. 146-155.
3. Gregory A, State A, Lin M, Manocha D, Livingston M. Interactive surface decomposition for polyhedral morphing. The Visual Computer 1999; 15(9): 453-470.
4. Zockler M, Stalling D, Hedge H-C. Fast and intuitive generation of geometric shape transitions. The Visual Computer 2000; 16(5): 241-253.
5. Shlafman S, Tal A, Katz S. Metamorphosis of polyhedral surfaces using decom-position. Eurographics'02 Proceedings 2002; 21(3): 219-228.
6. Lee T-Y, Huang P-H. Fast and intuitive metamorphosis of 3d polyhedral models using smcc mesh merging scheme. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2003; 9(1): 85-98.
7. Lin C-H, Lee T-Y. Metamorphosis of 3d polyhedral models using progres-sive connectivity transformations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2005; 11(1): 2-12.
8. Zuckerberger E, Tal A, Shlafman S. Polyhedral surface decomposition with applications. Computer and Graphics 2002; 26(5): 733-743.
9. Funkhouser T, Kazhdan M, Shilane P, et al. Modeling by example. SIGGRAPH'04 Proceedings, 2004; pp. 649-660.
10. Garland M, Willmott A, Heckbert P. Hierarchical face clustering on polygonal surfaces. Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 2001; pp. 49-58.
11. Mangan A, Whitaker R. Partitioning 3d surface meshes using watershed segmen-tation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1999; 5(4): 308-321.
12. Razdan A, Bae M. A hybrid approach to feature segmentation of triangle meshes. Computer-Aided Design 2003; 35: 783-789.
13. Katz S, Tal A. Hierarchical mesh decomposition using fuzzy clustering and cuts. In SIGGRAPH'03 Proceedings, 2003; pp. 954-961.
14. Lee Y, Lee S, Shamir A, Cohen-Or D, Seidel G-P. Intelligent mesh scissoring using 3d snakes. In The Proceedings of Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2004; pp. 279-287.
15. Karni Z, Gotsman C. Spectral compression of mesh geometry. In SIGGRAPH'00 Proceedings, 2000; pp. 279-286.
16. Shamir A. A formation of boundary mesh segmentation. In Proceedings of the second International Symposium on 3DPVT (3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Trans-mission), 2004; pp. 82-89.
17. Alexa M, Muller W. Representing animation by principal components. In Euro-graphics'02, 2002; pp. 411-418.
18. Sander P, Snyder J, Gortler S, Hoppe H. Texture mapping progressive meshes. SIGGRAPH'01 Proceedings, 2001; pp. 409-416.
19. Karni Z, Gotsman C. Compression of soft-body animation sequences. Computer and Graphics 2004; 28: 25-34.