A requirements-driven workload model for XML benchmark

Industrial Management and Data Systems

Volumn 105, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1096-1114

  Seng, Jia Lang ^a   Yu, Jing ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data structures; Database management systems

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DATA STRUCTURES; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUERY LANGUAGES; STANDARDS; XML;

COLLABORATIVE COMMERCE; ELECTRONIC DATA EXCHANGE; INDUSTRY STRANDARDS; THREE-COMPONENT WORKLOAD REQUIREMENT MODEL;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 27144443046     PISSN: 02635577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02635570510624473     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Bitton, D., DeWitt, D.J. and Turbyfill, C. (1983), "Benchmarking database systems - a systematic approach", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 8-19.
2. Bohme, T. and Rahm, F. (2001), "Xmach-1: benchmark for XML data management", Proceedings of the German Database Conference.
3. Carey, M.J., DeWitt, D.J. and Naughton, J.F. (1993), "The 007 benchmark", Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, May, pp. 12-21.
4. DeWitt, D. J. (1993), "The Wisconsin benchmark: past, present, and future", in Gray, J. (Ed.), The Benchmark Handbook for Database and Transaction Processing Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp. 269-316.
5. Florescu, D. and Kossmann, D. (1999), A performance evaluation of alternative mapping schemes for storing XML data in a relational database, Technical Report, No. 3680, INRIA.
6. IBM Press Release (2002), New SAP R/3 Performance Record byRS/6000 S80 and DB2 Overtakes HP and Oracle, IBM Press Release, Somers, NY.
7. Gray, J. (1993), The Benchmark Handbook, Morgan Kaufmann Inc., San Mateo, CA.
8. Li, Y.G., Bressan, S., Dobbie, G., Lacroix, Z., Lee, M.L., Nambiar, U. and Wadhwa, B. (2001), "X007: applying 007 benchmark to XML query processing tools", Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 27-36.
9. Microsoft SQL Server Benchmark (2002), available at: www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/compare/benchmarks.asp.
10. Oracle 9i Benchmark (2002), available at: www.oracle.com/features/9i/index.html?benches.html.
11. SAP (2002), New SAP R/3 Performance Record by RS/6000 S80 and DB2 Overtakes HP and Oracle, IBM Press Release, Somers, NY.
12. Schmidt, A.R., Kersten, M.L., Florescu, D., Carey, M.J., Manolescu, I. and Waas, F. (2000), "The XML store benchmark project", available at: www.xmlperformance.org.
13. Schmidt, A.R., Waas, F., Kersten, M.L., Florescu, D., Manolescu, I., Carey, M.J. and Busse, R. (2001a), "The XML benchmark project", CWI Technical Report.
14. Schmidt, A., Waas, F., Kersten, M.L., Florescu, D., Manolescu, I., Carey, M.J. and Busse, R. (2001b), "Why and how to benchmark XML database", ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 41-50.
15. Transaction Processing Performance Council Benchmark W (2002), Standard Specification.
16. Turbyfill, C. (1987), "Comparative benchmarking of relational database systems", unpublished doctoral dissertation TR87-871, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.