Influence on spinal cord blood flow and function by interruption of bilateral segmental arteries at up to three levels: Experimental study in dogs

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 20, 2005, Pages 2239-2243

  Ueda, Yasuhiro ^a,b   Kawahara, Norio ^a   Tomita, Katsuro ^a   Kobayashi, Tadayoshi ^a   Murakami, Hideki ^a   Nambu, Koshi ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KANAZAWA UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Interruption of segmental artery; Motor evoked potentials; Spinal cord blood flow; Spinal cord evoked potentials; Total en bloc spondylectomy

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD BLOOD FLOW; SPINAL CORD FUNCTION; SPINAL CORD POTENTIAL; SPINAL CORD SURGERY; SPINAL CORD TUMOR;

ANIMALS; ARTERIES; DOGS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; LIGATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PHYSIOLOGY; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SPINAL CORD; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 27144440091     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182308.47248.59     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy: A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine 1997;22:324-33.
2. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary spinal metastases. Int Orthop 1994;18:291-8.
3. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, et al. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 2001;26:298-306.
4. Broaddus WC, Grady NS, Delashaw JB, et al. Preoperative superselective arterior embolization: A new approach to enhance resectability of spinal tumors. Neurosurgery 1990;27:755-9.
5. Hess T, Kramann B, Schmidt W, et al. Use of preoperative vascular embolization in spinal metastasis resection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997;116:279-82.
6. Mizuno K. Epidural hemostasis by fibrin glue injection. J Juzen Med Soc 2001;110:171-9.
7. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Baba H, et al. Cadaveric vascular anatomy for total en bloc spondylectomy in malignant tumors. Spine 1996;21:1401-7.
8. Nambu K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, et al. Interruption of the bilateral segmental arteries at several levels: Influence on vertebral blood flow. Spine 2004;29:1530-4.
9. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Kobayashi T, et al. Influence of acute shortening on the spinal cord: An experimental study. Spine 2005;15:613-20.
10. Harakawa I, Yano T, Sakurai T, et al. Measurement of spinal cord blood flow by an inhalation method and intraarterial injection of hydrogen gas. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:623-8.
11. Koshu K, Kamiyama K, Oka N, et al. Measurement of regional blood flow using hydrogen gas generated by electrolysis. Stroke 1982;13:483-7.
12. Baba H, Kawahara N, Tomita K, et al. Spinal cord evoked potentials in cervical and thoracic myelopathy. Int Orthop 1993;17:82-6.
13. Baba H, Tomita K, Kawahara N, et al. Spinal cord evoked potentials in thoracic myelopathy with multisegmental vertebral involvement. Spine 1992;17:1291-5.
14. Tamaki T, Noguchi T, Takano H, et al. Spinal cord monitoring as a clinical utilization of the spinal evoked potential. Clin Orthop 1984;184:58-64.
15. Edmonds HL Jr, Pahoheimo MPJ, Backman MH, et al. Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (tsMMEP) for functional monitoring of motor pathways during scoliosis surgery. Spine 1989;14:683-6.
16. Baker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet 1985;1:1106-7.
17. Nakagawa Y, Tamaki T, Yamada H, et al. Discrepancy between decreases in the amplitude of compound muscle action potential and loss of motor function caused by ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord. J Orthop Sci 2002;7:102-10.
18. Nemoto M. Animal experiment on spinal cord ischemia with evoked potentials by transcranial electrical stimulation. Juntendo Igaku 1998;43:586-98.
19. Tarlov IM, Klinger H. Spinal cord compression studies. II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954;71:271-90.
20. Bohlman HH, Bahniuk E, Raskulinecz G, et al. Mechanical factors affecting recovery from incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: A preliminary report. Johns Hopkins Med J 1979;145:115-25.
21. Commisse GF. The blood supply of spinal cord: A critical vascular zone in spinal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56-B:225-35.
22. Evans HE, Christensen GC. Anatomy of the Dog. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1979.
23. Crock HV. The arterial supply and venous drainage of the vertebral column of the dog. J Anat 1960;94:88-99.
24. Dopman JL, Ramsey R. Selective arteriography of the lumbar spinal cord in dogs. Neuroradiology 1971;3:64-7.
25. Hassler O. Blood supply to human spinal cord. Arch Neural 1966;15:302-7.
26. Gundanna M, Eskennazi M, Bendo J, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of lumbar pedicle screw placement for in situ posterior spinal fusion. Spine J 2003;3:370-6.
27. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: Results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:6-11.
28. Ben-David B, Haller G, Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia: A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential. Spine 1987;12:536-9.
29. Ginsburg HH, Shelter AG, Raudzens PA. Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials: Case report. J Neurosurg 1985;63:296-300.
30. Gunnarsson T, Krassioukov AV, Sarjeant R, et al. Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: Correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases. Spine 2004;29:677-84.
31. Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Armbruster W, et al. False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: Analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:280-6.
32. Wilber RG, Thompson GH, Shaffer JW, et al. Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation: A study using spinal cord monitoring. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1178-87.
33. Amassian VE, Stewart M, Quirk GJ, et al. Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex. Neurosurgery 1987;20:74-93.
34. Machida M, Weinstein SL, Yamada T, et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Electrophysiological measures of sensory and motor function during spinal surgery. Spine 1985;10:407-13.
35. Levy WJ Jr, York DH. Evoked potentials from the motor tracts in humans. Neurosurgery 1983;12:422-9.
36. Kobrine AI, Evans DE, Rizzoli HV. Relative vulnerability of the brain and spinal cord to ischemia. J Neurol Sci 1980;45:65-72.
37. Lazorthes G, Gouaze A, Zadeh JO, et al. Arterial vascularization of the spinal cord: Recent studies of the anastomotic substitution pathways. J Neurosurg 1971;35:253-62.