Using anovaginal distance at the beginning of labor to predict the likelihood of instrumental delivery

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 50, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 759-763

  Lurie, Samuel ^a   Boaz, Mona ^b   Sadan, Oscar ^b  

^a WOLFSON MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Anus; Delivery; Labor; Vagina

Indexed keywords

ANUS; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; PARITY; PELVIS FLOOR; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VAGINA; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; VAGINA;

EID: 27144433479     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al: Williams Obstetrics. Twenty-first edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp 291-307, 425-467, 486-508
2. Greenhill JP: Obstetrics. Eleventh edition. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1955, pp 190, 193-214
3. Notzon FC, Cnattingius S, Bergsjo P, et al: Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: International comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:495-504
4. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Carnegie M, et al: Operative delivery during labour: Trends and predictive factors. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:115-123
5. Lurie S, Feinstein M, Blickstein I, et al: Safe epidural anesthesia performed during labor by an obstetrician. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1991;34:229-233