Trade remedies and world trade organization dispute settlement: Why are so few challenged?

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 515-555

  Bown, Chad P ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26944502373     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/429849     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 2002. The Economics of the World Trading System. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
2. _. 2005. Enforcement, Private Political Pressure and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Escape Clause. Journal of Legal Studies 34:471-513.
3. Bartelsman, Eric J., Randy A. Becker, and Wayne B. Gray. 2000. NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database, http://www.nber.org/nberces/nbprod96.htm.
4. Blonigen, Bruce A., and Chad P. Bown. 2003. Antidumping and Retaliation Threats. Journal of International Economics 60:249-73.
5. Blonigen, Bruce A., and Thomas J. Prusa. 2003. Antidumping. Pp. 251-84 in Handbook of International Trade, edited by E. Kwan Choi and James Harrigan. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
6. Bown, Chad P. 2002. Why Are Safeguards under the WTO So Unpopular? World Trade Review 1:47-62.
7. _. 2004a. How Different Are Safeguards from Antidumping: Evidence from U.S. Trade Policies Toward Steel. Unpublished manuscript. Brandeis University, July.
8. _. 2004b. On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement. Review of Economics and Statistics 86:811-23.
9. _. Forthcoming. Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties and Free Riders. World Bank Economic Review.
10. Bown, Chad P., and Meredith A. Crowley. 2004. Trade Deflection and Trade Depression. Working Paper No. 2003-26. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago.
11. Bown, Chad P., Bernard Hoekman, and Çaglar Ozden. 2003. The Pattern of U.S. Antidumping: The Path from Initial Filing to WTO Dispute Settlement. World Trade Review 2:349-71.
12. Busch, Marc L., and Eric Reinhardt. 2000. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes. Fordham International Law Journal 24:158-72.
13. Cunningham, Richard O., and Troy H. Crib. 2003. Dispute Settlement through the Lens of "Free Flow of Trade" - a Review of WTO Dispute Settlement of U.S. Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures. Journal of International Economic Law 6:155-70.
14. Durling, James P. 2003. Deference, but Only When Due: WTO Review of Antidumping Measures. Journal of International Economic Law 6:125-53.
15. Feenstra, Robert C., John Romalis, and Peter K. Schott. 2002. U.S. Imports, Exports and Tariff Data, 1989 to 2001. Working Paper No. 9387. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Feinberg, Robert M., and Kara M. Olson. 2004. The Spread of Antidumping Regimes and the Role of Retaliation in Filings. Unpublished manuscript. American University, November.
17. Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
18. Greenwald, John. 2003. WTO Dispute Settlement: An Exercise in Trade Law Legislation? Journal of International Economic Law 6:113-24.
19. Hansen, Wendy, and Thomas J. Prusa. 1996. Cumulation and ITC Decision-Making: The Sum of the Parts Is Greater than the Whole. Economic Inquiry 34: 746-69.
20. _. 1997. The Economics and Politics of Trade Policy: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Decision Making. Review of International Economics 5:230-45.
21. Heckman, James J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47:153-61.
22. Hoekman, Bernard M., and Michael M. Kostecki. 2001. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Holmes, Peter, Jim Rollo, and Alasdair Young. 2003. Emerging Trends in WTO Dispute Settlement: Back to GATT? Unpublished manuscript. University of Sussex.
24. Horn, Henrik, Petros C. Mavroidis, and Håkan Nordström. 1999. Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased? Discussion Paper No. 2340. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
25. Irwin, Douglas A. 2003. Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in U.S. Section 201 Cases. World Trade Review 2:297-325.
26. Martin, Alberto, and Wouter Vergote. 2004. Antidumping: Welfare Enhancing Retaliation? Unpublished manuscript. Columbia University, October.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. International Development Statistics (CD-ROM). Paris: OECD, Development and Assistance Committee.
28. Prusa, Thomas J. 1992. Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn? Journal of International Economics 33:1-20.
29. _. 2001. On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics 34:591-611.
30. Prusa, Thomas J., and Susan Skeath. 2005. Modern Commercial Policy: Managed Trade or Retaliation? Pp. 358-82 in Economic and Legal Analyses of Trade Policy and Institutions, vol. 2 of Handbook of International Trade, edited by E. Kwan Choi and James Hartigan. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
31. Staiger, Robert W., and Frank A. Wolak. 1994. Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 51-118.
32. Sykes, Alan O. 1991. Protectionism as a "Safeguard": A Positive Analysis of the GATT "Escape Clause" with Normative Speculations. University of Chicago Law Review 58:255-305.
33. _. 2003. The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence. World Trade Review 2:261-95.
34. Tarullo, Daniel K. 2003. Paved with Good Intentions: The Dynamic Effects of WTO Review of Anti-dumping Action. World Trade Review 2:373-93.
35. U.S. Census Bureau. 1996. 1992 Economic Census: Concentration Ratios in Manufacturing. http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/concentration.html.
36. U.S. Census Bureau. 1993-2004. Current Industrial Reports, Survey of Plant Capacity. http://www.census.gov/cir/www/mqc1pag2.html.
37. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. U.S. Census of Manufactures, Concentration Ratios in Manufacturing, http://www.census.gov/prod/ec97/m31-cr.pdf.
38. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. 2002 Economic Census, Manufacturing Industry Series. http://www.census.gov/econ.census02/guide/INDRPT31.HTM.
39. Van de Ven, Wynand, and Bernard Van Praag. 1981. The Demand for Deductibles in Private Health Insurance: A Probit Model with Sample Selection. Journal of Econometrics 17:229-52.
40. World Bank. 2005. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
41. World Trade Organization. 2002. Liaison Officers and Representatives to WTO. Unpublished manuscript. World Trade Organization, Geneva.
42. _. 2004. WTO Dispute Settlement: Status in Brief of the Disputes, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_status_e.htm.
43. Zanaradi, Maurizio. 2004. Antidumping: What Are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha? World Economy 27:403-33.