|
|
Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 31-33
|
|
How not to rethink research ethics
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MANDATORY PROGRAM;
METHODOLOGY;
MOTIVATION;
NOTE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE;
RESEARCH ETHICS;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COERCION;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
ETHICS, RESEARCH;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MANDATORY PROGRAMS;
MOTIVATION;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS;
REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
|
EID: 26944490399
PISSN: 15265161
EISSN: 15360075
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590927697 Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (7)
|
|
References (1)
|
