Regulating GM crops in the Netherlands: Precaution as societal-ethical evaluation

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 309-316

  Schenkelaars, Piet ^a  

^a Schenkelaars Biotechnology Consultancy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLICY; ETHICS; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

BENELUX; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 26944489597     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154305781779416     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2000), "Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle", COM(2000) 1, Brussels, 2 February, available at , last accessed 20 January 2003.
2. CTS, Centre for Technology Strategy (Open University, UK) (2004), "Precautionary expertise for GM crope", supported by grant from European Commission 5th Framework Programme Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources, project no QLRT-2001-00034, available at , last accessed 12 March 2005.
3. Funtowicz, S, and J Ravetz. (1993), "Science for the post-normal age", Futures, 25(7), pages 327-336.
4. SBC, Schenkelaars; Biotechnology Consultancy (2004), "The Netherlands: precaution as societal-ethical evaluation", national report for project 'Precautionary expertise for GM crops', supported by grant from European Commission 5th Framework Programme Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources, project no QLRT-2001-00034, available at , last accessed 25 April 2005.
5. Stirling, A (1999), "On science and precaution in the management of technological risk", SPRU, Brighton, UK, final report for EC Forward Studies Unit, available at , last accessed 9 April 2005.
6. von Schomberg, R (1996), "Netherlands: deliberating biotechnology regulation", Science and Public Policy, 23(3), June, pages 158-163.
7. Wynne, B (1992), "Risk and social learning: reification to engagement", in Krimsky and Golding (editors), Social Theories of Risk (Praeger, New York) pages 275-297.