Agreement between observations on the functional capacity of home care elderly patients;Concordância de observações sobre a capacidade funcional de idosos em assistência domiciliar

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 655-662

  Ricci, Natalia Aquaroni ^a,b   Kubota, Maristela Tiemi ^a   Cordeiro, Renata Cereda ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aging health; Caregivers; Frail elderly; Geriatric assessment; Home care services; Home nursing; Homebound patients

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELDERLY CARE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MOBILIZATION; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; WALKING;

EID: 26944481069     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102005000400021     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Applegate WB, Blass JP, Williams TF. Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1207-14.
2. Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S21-9.
3. Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: Wiley; 1999.
4. Cordeiro RC, Dias RC, Dias JMD, Perracini M, Ramos LR. Concordância entre observadores de um protocolo de avaliação fisioterapêutica em idosas institucionalizadas. Rev Fisioter Univ São Paulo 2002;9:69-77.
5. Duarte YAO, Diogo MJD. Atendimento domiciliário: um enfoque gerontológico. In: Duarte YAO, Diogo MJD. Atendimento domiciliar: um enfoque gerontológico. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2000. p. 3-17.
6. Fillenbaum GG. Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33:689-706.
7. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical measurement. New York: Wiley; 1986.
8. Guralnik JM, Branch LG, Cummings SR, Curb JD. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol 1989;44:M141-6.
9. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, Kayton RM. Interrater agreement of the seven-level Functional Independence Measure (F.I.M.). Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:790.
10. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measure by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:566-73.
11. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226-32.
12. Pavarini SCI. Dependência comportamental na velhice: uma análise do cuidado prestado ao idoso institucionalizado [dissertação de doutorado]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 1996.
13. Pavarini SCI, Neri AL. Compreendendo dependência, independência e autonomia no contexto domiciliar: conceitos, atitudes e comportamentos. In: Duarte YAO, Diogo MJD. Atendimento domiciliar: um enfoque gerontológico. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2000. p. 49-70.
14. Ramos LR, Simões EJ, Albert MS. Dependence in activities of daily living and cognitive impairment strongly predicted mortality in older urban residents in Brazil: a 2- years follow-up. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1168-75.
15. Rapp SR, Reynalds DL. Families, social support, and caregiven. In: Hazzard WR. Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontologic. 4nd ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 1999. p. 333-43.
16. Rigolin VOS. Avaliação clínico-funcional de idosos hospitalizados [tese de mestrado]. Sõ Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2001.
17. Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, Jorge Filho D, Sakamoto H, Battistella LR. Reprodutibilidade da versão brasileira da medida de independência funcional. Acta Fisiátrica 2001;8:45-52.
18. Rosa TEC, Benício MHD, Latorre MRDO, Ramos LR. Fatores determinantes da capacidade funcional entre idosos. Rev Saúde Pública 2003;37:40-8.
19. Rubenstein LZ, Schairer C, Wieland GD, Kane R. Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: effects of different data sources. J Gerontol 1984;39:686-91.
20. Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, Sander AM. Concordance of patients' and family members' ratings of neurobehavioral functioning after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:1254-9.
21. Silvestre JA, Costa Neto MM. Abordagem do idoso em programas de saúde da família. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19: 839-47.
22. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8.
23. Wijlhuizen GJ, Ooijendijk W. Measuring disability, the agreement between self evaluation and observation of performance. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:61-7.
24. Yuaso DR, Sguizzatto GT. Serviço de Assistência Domiciliária ao Idoso (SADI) do centro de referência à saúde do idoso do município de Guarulhos. In: Duarte YAO, Diogo MJD. Atendimento domiciliar: um enfoque gerontológico. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2000. p. 565-73.