Consensus measures and adjusting inconsistency of linguistic preference relations in group decision making

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3613, Issue PART I, 2005, Pages 130-139

  Fan, Zhi Ping ^a   Chen, Xia ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Consensus degree; Feedback mechanism; Group decision making (GDM); Linguistic preference relation

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; VECTORS;

CONSENSUS DEGREE; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; GROUP DECISION MAKING (GDM); LINGUISTIC PREFERENCE RELATION;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 26944480049     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11539506_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Saaty T A. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill (1980).
2. Orlorski S A. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 3 (1978) 155-167.
3. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F. A Consensus Model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3 (2002) 394-402.
4. Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18 (1988) 183-190.
5. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79 (1996) 175-190.
6. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment. Information Science, 4 (1995) 223-239.
7. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Model of Consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1 (1996) 73-87.
8. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Linguistic Measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 3 (1997) 309-334.
9. Fan Z P, Xiao S H. Consistency and Ranking method for comparison matrix with linguistic assessment. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 5 (2002) 87-91.