Functional significance of arytenoid adduction with the suture attaching to cricoid cartilage versus to thyroid cartilage for unilateral paralytic dysphonia

Laryngoscope

Volumn 115, Issue 10 I, 2005, Pages 1752-1759

  Su, Chih Ying ^a,d   Tsai, Shang Shyue ^b   Chuang, Hui Ching ^a   Chiu, Jeng Fen ^c  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c FOOYIN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Glottal configuration and vocal fold level; Lateral cricoarytenoid muscle; Medialization laryngoplasty and thyroplasty; Paramedian approach to arytenoid adduction; Unilateral vocal fold paralysis

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARYTENOID ADDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CRICOID; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGOPLASTY; LARYNX CARTILAGE; LARYNX MUSCLE; LARYNX SURGERY; LATERAL CRICOARYTENOID MUSCLE; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; MUSCLE FLAP; PARALYTIC DYSPHONIA; PARAMEDIAN APPROACH; PATIENT MONITORING; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRAP MUSCLE TRANSPOSITION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; VOCAL CORD; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS; VOICE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARYTENOID CARTILAGE; CRICOID CARTILAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; THYROID CARTILAGE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 26944476233     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000172203.28583.63     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hong KH, Jung KS. Arytenoid appearance and vertical level difference between the paralyzed and innervated vocal cords. Laryngoscope 2001;112:227-232.
2. Isshiki N, Mortia H, Okamura H, Hiramoto M. Thyroplasty as a new phonosurgical technique. Acta Otolaryngol 1974; 78:451-457.
3. Isshiki N, Tanabe M, Sawada M. Arytenoid adduction for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol 1978;104: 555-558.
4. Nasri S, Sercarz JA, Azizzaden B, et al. Measurement of adductory force of individual laryngeal muscles in an in vivo canine model. Laryngoscope 1994;104:1213-1218.
5. Inagi K, Connor NP, Suzuki T, et al. Visual observations of glottal configuration and vocal outcomes in arytenoid adduction. Am J Otolaryngol 2003;124:290-296.
6. Su CY, Lui CC, Lin HC, et al. A new paramedian approach to adduction and strap muscle transposition for vocal fold medialization. Laryngoscope 2002;112:342-350.
7. Su CY, Tasi SS, Chiu JF, Cheng CA. Medialization laryngoplasty with strap muscle transposition for vocal ford atrophy with or without sulcus vocalis. Laryngoscope 2004;114: 1106-1112.
8. Su CY, Chuang HC, Tsai SS, Chiu CA. Bipedicled strap muscle tranposition for vocal fold deficit after laser cordectomy in early glottic cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2005; 115:528-533.
9. Woodson GE, Hengesteg A, Rosen CA, et al. Changes in length and spatial orientation of the vocal fold with arytenoid adduction in cadaver larynges. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:552-557.
10. Slavit DH, Maragos NE. Physiologic assessment of arytenoid adduction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101: 321-327.
11. Neuman TR, Hendesteg A, Lepage RP, et al. Three-dimensional motion of the arytenoid adduction procedure in cadaver larynges. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103: 265-270.
12. Woodson GE, Murry T. Glottic configuration after arytenoids adduction. Laryngoscope 1994;104:965-969.
13. Benninger MS, Crumely RL, Ford CN, et al. Evaluation and treatment of the unilateral paralyzed vocal fold. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:770-775.
14. Hoffman HT, McCulloch TM. Anatomic considerations in the surgical treatment of unilateral laryngeal paralysis. Head Neck 1996;6:174-187.
15. Hirano M, Nosoe I, Shin T, Maeyama T. Electromyography for laryngeal paralysis. In: Hirano, M, Kirchner J, Bless D, eds. Neurolaryngology: Recent Advances. Boston: College Hill, 1987:232-248.