|
Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 86-88
|
Pediatric resusitation: Questioning DNAR legitimacy and offering an alternative decision-making model
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
CHILD;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JUVENILE;
LEGAL ASPECT;
NOTE;
PARENT;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RESUSCITATION;
SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE;
STANDARD;
STUDENT;
UNITED STATES;
UNIVERSITY;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
CHILD;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
DECISION MAKING;
FACULTY;
HUMANS;
MINORS;
PARENTS;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RESUSCITATION ORDERS;
SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES;
STUDENTS;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 26944474467
PISSN: 15265161
EISSN: 15360075
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/152651690927917 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (6)
|