The form of augmented force-feedback fields and the efficiency and satisfaction in computer-aided pointing tasks

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 418-429

  Keuning, Hilde ^a   Monné, Tom K J ^a   Ijsselsteijn, Wijnand A ^a   Houtsma, Adrianus J M ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b U S ARMY AEROMEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER POINTING DEVICES; FORCE FIELDS; USER SATISFACTION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; STRAIN;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRODUCTIVITY; SATISFACTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EFFICIENCY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEX FACTORS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 26944473271     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/0018720054679560     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Akamatsu, M., & Sato, S. (1994). A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 443-453.
2. Dennerlein, J., & Yang, M. (2001). Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: Performance and musculoskeletal loading issues. Human Factors, 43, 278-286.
3. Engel, F. L., Goossens, P., & Haakma, R. (1994). Improved efficiency through I- and E-fecdback: A trackball with contextual force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41, 949-974.
4. Gobel, M., Luczak, H., Springer, J., Hedicke, V., & Rotting, M. (1995). Tactile feedback applied to computer mice. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1-24.
5. Goossens, P. (1992). Trackball with force feedback (IPO Report 882). Eindhoven, Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.
6. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
7. Hasser, C., Goldenberg, A., Martin, K., & Rosenberg, L. (1998). User performance in a GUI pointing task with low-cost force feedback computer mouse. In Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (pp. 151-156). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
8. Keuning, H. (2003). Augmented force feedback to facilitate target acquisition in human-computer interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
9. Keuning, H., & Houtsma, A. J. M. (2000). Cursor trajectory analysis. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Haptic Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 69-72). Berlin: Springer.
10. Keuning, H., Van Galen, G. P., & Houtsma, A. J. M. (2005). The role of size of an augmented force field in computer-aided target acquisition. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 219-232.
11. Keyson, D. V. (1996). Touch in user interface navigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
12. Keyson, D. V., & Tang, H. (1995). TacTool: A tactile rapid prototyping tool for visual interfaces. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 67-74). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Leenders, G. (1994). Tactile fields and target acquisition in the user interface. Unpublished master's thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
14. McGuffin, M., & Balakrishnan, R. (2002). Acquisition of expanding targets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 57-64). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
15. Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer, 16, 57-69.
16. Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1997). Cross-modal links in attention between audition, vision, and touch: Implications for interface design. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1, 351-373.
17. Van Galen, G., Müller, M., Meulenbroek, R., & Van Gemmert, A. (2002). Forearm EMG response activity during motor performance in individuals prone to increased stress reactivity. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41, 406-419.
18. Vogels, I. M. L. C. (2004). Detection of temporal delays in visual-haptic interfaces. Human Factors, 46, 118-134.
19. Welch, R., & Warren, D. (1986). Intersensory interaction. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 25.1-25.36). New York: Wiley.
20. Wickens, C., Gordon, S., & Liu, Y. (1998). An introduction to human factors engineering. Reading: Addison-Wesley Educational.