A model for schema integration in heterogeneous databases

Proceedings of the International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, IDEAS

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 2-11

  Gal, A ^a   Trombetta, A ^b   Anaby Tavor, A ^a   Montesi, D ^c  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE MEASURE; HETEROGENEOUS DATABASE; INTEGRATION PROCESS; MATCHING ALGORITHM; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; PROCESS PROPERTIES; SCHEMA INTEGRATION; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS;

IMAGE MATCHING; INTEGRATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 26944471264     PISSN: 10988068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IDEAS.2003.1214906     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. A. Anaby-Tavor, A. Gal, and A. Moss. Efficient algorithms for top-k matchings. Submitted for publication. Available upon request from avi-gal@ie.technion.ac.il, 2003.
2. W.G. Aref, D. Barbara, S. Johnson, and S. Mehrotra. Efficient processing of proximity queries for large databases. In P.S. Yu and A.L.P. Chen, editors, Proceedings of the. IEEE CS International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 147-154. IEEE Computer Society, 1995.
3. S. Bergamaschi, S. Castano, M. Vincini, and D. Beneventano. Semantic integration of heterogeneous information sources. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 36(3), 2001.
4. P. Ciaccia, D. Montesi, W. Penzo, and A. Trombetta. Imprecision and user preferences in multimedia queries: A generic algebraic approach. In Lecture Notes on Computer Science, 1762, pages 50-71. Springer, 2000.
5. L.S. Davis and N. Roussopoulos. Approximate pattern matching in a pattern database system. Information systems, 5(2):107-119, 1980.
6. L. G. DeMichiel. Performing operations over mism atched domains. In Proceedings of the IEEE CS International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 36-45, Los Angeles, CA, February 1989.
7. A. Doan, P. Domingos, and A.Y. Halevy. Reconciling sc hemas of disparate data sources: A machine-learning approach. In Walid G. Aref, editor, Proceedings of the ACM-SIGMOD conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Santa Barbara, California, May 2001. ACM Press.
8. J. Drakopoulos. Probabilities, possibilities and fuzzy sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 75(1):1-15, 1995.
9. T. Eiter, T. Lukasiewicz, and M. Walter. Extension of the relational algebra to probabilistic complex values. In B. Thalheim K.-D. Schewe, editor, Lecture Notes on Computer Science, 1762, pages 94-115. Springer, 2000.
10. R. Fagin. Combining fuzzy information from multiple systems. J. of Computer and System Sciences, 58:83-99, 1999.
11. W.B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates, editors. Information Retrieval: Data Structures & Algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewoo d Cliffs, NJ 07632, 1992.
12. N. Fridman Noy and M.A. Musen. PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), pages 450-455, Austin, TX, 2000.
13. A. Gal, A. Trombetta, A. Anaby-Tavor, and D. Montesi. A framework for evaluating similarity-based schema matching. Submitted for publication. Available upon request from avigal@ie.technion.ac.il, 2003.
14. P. Hajek. The Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1998.
15. R. Hull. Managing semantic heterogeneity in databases: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 51-61. ACM Press, 1997.
16. G.J. Klir and B. Yuan, editors. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Prentice Hall, 1995.
17. J. Madhavan, P.A. Bernstein, P. Domingos, and AY. Halevy. Representing and re asoning about mappings between domain models. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI/IAAI), pages 80-86, 2002.
18. J. Madhavan, P.A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic schema matching with cupid. In Proceedings of the Inter-national conference on very Large Data Bases (VLDB), pages 49-58, Rome, Italy, September 2001.
19. E. Mena, V. Kashayap, A. Illarramendi, and A. Sheth. Imprecise answers in distributed environments: Estimation of information loss for multi-ontological based query processing. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 9(4):403-425, 2000.
20. R.J. Miller, M.A. Hernandez, L.M. Haas, L.-L. Yan, C.T.H. Ho, R. Fagin, and L. Popa. The clio project: Managing heterogeneity. SIG-MOD Record, 30(l):78-83, 2001.
21. G. Modica, A. Gal, and H. Jamil. The use of machine-generated ontologies in dynamic information seeking. In C. Batini, F. Giunchiglia, P. Giorgini, and M. Mecella, editors, Cooperative Information Systems, 9th International Conference, CoopIS 2001, Trento, Italy, September 5-7, 2001, Proceedings, volume 2172 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 433-448. Springer, 2001.
22. L. Palopoli, L.G. Terracina, and D. Ursino. The system DIKE:towards the semi-automatic synthesis of cooperative information systems and data warehouses. In PADBIS-DASFAA, pages 108-117, 2000.
23. A. Sheth and J. Larson. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3):183-236, 1990.