Policy development and new immigrant communities: A case study of citizen input in defining transit problems

Public Administration Review

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 614-623

  Schachter, Hindy Lauer ^a   Liu, Rongfang ^a,b  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26944467601     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00488.x     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bruere, Henry. 1912. Efficiency in City Government. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 41: 1-22.
2. Dzur, Albert. 2003. Professionals vs. Democracy? Reexamining the Critique of Technocratic Expertise. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28-31, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Fiorino, Daniel. 1990. Can Problems Shape Priorities? The Case of Risk-Based Environmental Planning. Public Administration Review 50(1): 82-90.
4. Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Gerring, John. 2004. What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For? American Political Science Review 98(2): 341-54.
7. Hajer, Maarten. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
8. Hawkins, H. Gene. 1999. Traffic Control Devices in Texas Border Areas: Summary of Research and Recommendations. College Station: Texas Transportation Institute.
9. Irvin, Renée A., and John Stansbury. 2004. Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review 64(1): 55-65.
10. Johnson, Gail. 2002. Research Methods for Public Administrators. Westport, CT: Quorum.
11. King, Cheryl Simrell, Kathryn Feltey, and Bridget O'Neill Susel. 1998. The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 58(4): 317-26.
12. Kingdon, John. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
13. Lipscomb, Michael, and Robert O'Connor. 2002. Democracy and Communicative Rifts: Foucault, Fish and Yucca Mountain. Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(3): 393-414.
14. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Division of Research and Technology. 2002a. Project 2003-21, Mobility Information Needs for Limited English Proficiency People in New Jersey - Market/Demographic Analysis. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Transportation.
15. _. 2002b. Project 2003-20, Mobility Information Needs of Limited English Proficiency People in New Jersey - Best Practices. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Transportation.
16. Poister, Theodore. 1982. Federal Transportation Policy for the Elderly and the Handicapped: Responsive to Real Needs? Public Administration Review 42(1): 6-14.
17. Roberts, Nancy. 1997. Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction. Public Administration Review 57(2): 124-32.
18. Schattschneider, E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
19. Schneider, Anne Larason, and Helen Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
20. Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Thomas, John Clayton. 1990. Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory. Public Administration Review 50(4): 435-45.
22. Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2001. Communicating with Persons with Disabilities in a Multimodal Transit Environment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23. United Kingdom. Department for Transport. 2003. Transport Requirements of Minority Ethnic and Faith Communities: Good Practice. Wetherby, West Yorkshire: U.K. Department for Transport.
24. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2002. Demographic Profile: 2000 Census of Population and Housing, Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2001. DOT Guidance to Recipients on Special Language Services to Limited English Proficient (LEP) Beneficiaries. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, http://www.wifcon.com/ fapolarcDOT.htm.
26. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board. 2001. Plan to Improve Service to Individuals with Limited English Proficiency. Washington, DC: U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, http://www.rrb.gov/ blaw/leptoc.html.
27. Wachs, Martin. 2003. Local Option Transportation Taxes: Devolution as Revolution. Access 22: 9-15.
28. Williams, Bruce, and Albert Matheny. 1995. Democracy, Dialogue and Environmental Disputes: The Contested Languages of Social Regulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.