|
Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 308-309
|
Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined GT: In regard to Paulino et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:1385-1392) [2] (multiple letters)
a a a b c |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA;
HUMAN;
HYPOPHARYNX TUMOR;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LARYNX TUMOR;
LETTER;
NOSE CAVITY TUMOR;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PARANASAL SINUS TUMOR;
PAROTID GLAND TUMOR;
PHARYNX TUMOR;
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;
TUMOR VOLUME;
COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOTHERAPY;
HEAD AND NECK TUMOR;
NOTE;
RADIOGRAPHY;
SCINTISCANNING;
CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL;
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18;
HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS;
HUMANS;
POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;
RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 26944460046
PISSN: 03603016
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.038 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (16)
|
References (4)
|