Research participation: Are we subject to a duty?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 48-49

  Wachbroit, Robert ^a   Wasserman, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MANDATORY PROGRAM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PATIENT SELECTION; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 26944441314     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590927831     Document Type: Note

References (2)

1. Rhodes, R. 2005. Rethinking research ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 5(1): 7-28.
2. Wachbroit, R.S., and D. Wasserman. 1995. Patient autonomy and value-neutrality in nondirective genetic counseling. Stanford Law & Policy Review 6:103-112.