Investigating text input methods for mobile phones

Telematics and Informatics

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-21

  Curran, Kevin ^a   Woods, Derek ^a   Riordan, Barry O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; COMPETITION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MARKETING; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

MOBILE PHONES; TEXT INPUT METHODS; USABILITY; USER FRIENDLINESS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 26944440024     PISSN: 07365853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2004.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Butts, L., Cockburn, K., 2002. An evaluation of mobile phone text input methods. In: Grundy, J., Calder, P. (Eds.), Proc. Third Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC2002), Melbourne, Australia. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, ACS. pp. 55-59.
2. Buzing, P., 2003. Comparing Different Keyboard Layouts: Aspects of QWERTY, DVORAK and Alphabetical Keyboards, July 31. Online at http://pds.twi.tudelft.nl/~buzing.
3. M.D. Dunlop, and D. Crossan A Predictive Text Entry Method for Mobile Phones Personal Technologies 134-143 2000 2000
4. P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 1954 381 391
5. Hinckley, K., Horvitz, E., 2001. Toward more sensitive mobile phones. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Sofware and Technology, New York, NY, ACM.
6. Isokoski, P., Raisamo, R., 2000. Device independent text input: a rationale and an example. In: Proceedings of AVI 2000 Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM, New York, pp. 76-83.
7. James, C., Longe, M., 2000. Bringing Text Input beyond the Desktop. CHI 1-6 April.
8. James, C., Reischel, K., 2001. Text Input for Mobile Devices: Comparing Model Prediction to Actual Performance. CHI, 31 March-5 April, pp. 366-371.
9. MacKenzie, I.S., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., 1991. A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. In: Proc of CHI91. ACM, New York, pp. 161-166.
10. MacKenzie, I.S., Zhang, S., 1999. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. In: Proc of CHI99. ACM, New York, pp. 25-31.
11. MacKenzie, I.S., Kober, H., Smith, D., Jones, T., Skepner, E., 2001. LetterWise: prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, November 11-14, Orlando, Florida, pp. 111-113.
12. MacKenzie, S., Soukoref, W.R., 2003. Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques. CHI, April 5-10 2003, pp. 754-755.
13. Sirisena, A., 2002. Mobile Text Entry. November 2002, pp. 3-7 & 23-33.
14. Silfverberg, M., MacKenzie, I.S., Korhonen, P., 2000. Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing system, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp: 9-16.
15. Soukoref, W.R., MacKenzie, S.I., (2001). Measuring Errors in Text Entry Tasks: An Application of the Levenshtein String Distance Statistic, CHI, 2001, pp. 319-320.
16. Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R., 2003. TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 16h Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM.
17. Wigdor, D., (2004). Chording and Tilting For Rapid, Unambiguous Text Entry to Mobile Phone. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/~dwigdor/research/thesis/ submitted.html.