Revising beliefs through arguments: Bridging the gap between argumentation and belief revision in MAS

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3366, Issue , 2005, Pages 78-94

  Paglieri, Fabio ^a   Castelfranchi, Cristiano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ARGUMENTATION THEORIES; ARGUMENTATION-BASED MODELS; EPISTEMIC CHANGES; MAS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 26844579756     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Alechina, N., Logan, B.: Ascribing Beliefs to Resource Bounded Agents. Proceedings of AAMAS'02 (2002)
2. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Automated Reasoning 29 (2002) 125-169
3. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Maudet, N.: Arguments, Dialogue and Negotiation. Proceedings of ECAI 2000, Berlin (2000)
4. van Benthem, J., van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Veltman, F. (eds.): Logic and Argumentation. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1996)
5. Castelfranchi, C.: Guarantees for Autonomy in Cognitive Agent Architecture. Proceedings ECAI 1994 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Springer, Berlin (1995) 56-70
6. Castelfranchi, C.: Reasons: Belief Support and Goal Dynamics". Mathware & Soft Computing 3 (1996) 233-247
7. De Rosis, F., Grasso, F., Castelfranchi, C., Poggi, I.: Modeling Conflict-Resolution Dialogues. J. H. Mller, R. Dieng (eds.): Computational Conflicts. Springer, Berlin (2000) 41-62
8. Doyle, J.: Reason Maintenance and Belief Revision: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories. P. G‰rdenfors (ed.): Belief Revision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992) 29-51
9. Dragoni, A. F., Giorgini, P.: Distributed Belief Revision. Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems 6 (2003) 115-143
10. Falappa, M. A., Kern-Isberner, G., Simari, G. R.: Explanations, Belief Revision and Defeasible Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 141 (2002) 1-28
11. Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A., Bem, S. (eds.): Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
12. Fullam, K.: An Expressive Belief Revision Framework Based on Information Valuation. MS thesis, University of Texas at Austin (2003)
13. 13.Galliers, J. R.: Autonomous Belief Revision and Communication. P. G‰rdenfors (ed.): Belief Revision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992) 220-246
14. 14.G‰rdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)
15. Gillies, A. S.: Two More Dogmas of Belief Revision: Justification and Justified Belief Change. Working paper, Harvard University (2003) consulted on May 2004, available at: http://www.people.fas.Harvard.edu/~gillies/dogmas.pdf
16. 16.Grasso, F.: A Mental Model for a Rhetorical Arguer. Proceedings of EuroCogsci 03, LEA (2003)
17. Guerini, M., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M.: Persuasion Models for Intelligent Interfaces. Proceedings of IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (2003)
18. Huns, M. N., Bridgeland, D. M.: Multiagent Truth Maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21 (1991) 1437-1445
19. Kakas, A., MoraÔtis, P.: Argumentation Based Decision Making for Autonomous Agents. Proceedings of AAMAS 2003, Melbourne (2003), 883-890
20. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Desiderata for Agent Argumentation Protocols. Proceedings of AAMAS 2002, Bologna (2002)
21. Paglieri, F.: Data-oriented Belief Revision: Towards a Unified Theory of Epistemic Processing. Proceeding of STAIRS 2004, Valencia, IOS Press (2004)
22. Parsons, S., Petterson, O., Saffiotti, A., Wooldridge, M.: Intention Reconsideration in Theory and Practice. Proceedings of ECAI2000, Berlin (2000)
23. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (2003) 347-376
24. Pezzulo, G., Calvi, G.: AKIRA: a Framework for Multi-Agent Based Simulation. Proceedings of MAMABS 2004 (2004)
25. Piaget, J.: The Language and Thought of the Child. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner (1926)
26. 26.Pollock, J. L., Gillies, A. S.: Belief Revision and Epistemology. Synthese 122 (2000) 69-92
27. Segerberg, K.: Two Traditions in the Logic of Belief: Bringing Them Together. H. J. Ohlbach, U. Reyle (eds.): Logic, Language and Reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999) 135-147
28. 28.Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (updated edition 2003, orig. ed. 1958)
29. Vygotsky, L. S.: Thought and Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1962)
30. Walton, D. N.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. LEA, Mahwah (1996)
31. 31.Wassermann, R.: Resource-Bounded Belief Revision. ILLC dissertation series DS-2000-01, Amsterdam (2000)