Aerial ultra-low-volume assessment of anvil 10+10® against Anopheles quadrimaculatus

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 301-304

  Meisch, Max V ^a   Dame, David A ^b   Brown, James R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b Entomological Services   (United States)

^c Navy Disease Vector Ecology and Control Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerial application; Anopheles quadrimaculatus; ANVIL 10+10 ; Arkansas; Optimization; Ultra low volume

Indexed keywords

ANOPHELES QUADRIMACULATUS;

EID: 26844573805     PISSN: 8756971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2987/8756-971X(2005)21[301:AUAOAA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Abbott WS. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265-267.
2. Brown JR, Mickle RI. 1999. Optimizing aerial sprays for mosquito control. Pest control. Am Mosq Control Assoc Spec Ed Feb.:1-12.
3. Meisch MV, Dame DA, Groves RL, Nunez RD. 1994. Assessment of Anopheles quadrimaculatus response to permethrin and resmethrin by topical application. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 10:437-439.
4. Mickle RE, Brown JR. 2001. Optimization trials for the aerial application of Aqua-Reslin® using rotary atomizers Ayr, Ontario, Canada: REMspc.
5. Sandoski CA, Kottkamp WB, Yearian WC, Meisch MV. 1983. Efficacy of resmethrin alone and in combination with piperonyl butoxide against native riceland Anopheles quadrimaculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Econ Entomol 76:646-648.
6. SAS® 2003. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC 27513.