Constraining premise sets for counterfactuals

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-158

  Kratzer, Angelika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844568829     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffh020     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Casati, R. & Varzi, A. (1999) Parts and Places. The Structures of Spatial Representation. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
2. Kanazawa, M., Kaufmann, S. & Peters, S. (2005) 'On the lumping semantics for counterfactuals'. Journal of Semantics, this issue.
3. Kratzer, A. (1976) 'Was "können" und "müssen" bedeuten können müssen'. Linguistische Berichte 42:128-160.
4. Kratzer, A. (1977) 'What "must" and "can" must and can mean'. Linguistics and Philosophy 1:337-355.
5. Kratzer A. (1981) 'Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals'. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10:201-216.
6. Kratzer, A. (1989) 'An investigation of the lumps of thought'. Linguistics and Philosophy 12:607-653.
7. Kratzer, A. (1990) 'How specific is a fact?' In Proceedings of the 1990 Conference on Theories of Partial Information. Center for Cognitive Science and College of Liberal Arts at the University of Texas at Austin.
8. Kratzer, A. (2002) 'Facts: Particulars or information units?' Linguistics and Philosophy 25:2002, 655-670.
9. Lewis, D. K. (1973) Counterfactuals. Blackwell. Oxford.
10. Lewis, D. K. (1979) 'Counterfactual dependence and time's arrow'. Nous 13:418-446.
11. Lewis, D. K. (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell. Oxford.
12. Tichy, P (1976) 'A counterexample to the Stalnaker-Lewis analysis of counterfactuals'. Philosophical Studies 29:271-273.
13. Veltman, F. (1976) 'Prejudices, presuppositions and the theory of conditionals'. In J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof (eds) Amsterdam Papers in Formal Grammar, Vol. 1. Centrale Interfaculteit, Universiteit van Amsterdam.