The identification and development of giftedness as a paradigm for school reform

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 95-114

  Renzulli, Joseph S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Giftedness; School reform; Talent development

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844558069     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009429218821     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adler, M. J. (Ed.) (1990). The Syntopicon: An Index to the Great Ideas, Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago.
2. Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist 30: 140-151.
3. Albert, R. S. (Ed.) (1983). Genius and Eminence, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, New York, pp. 241-252.
4. Barron, F. (1968). Creativity and Personal Freedom, Van Nostrand, New York.
5. Barron, F. (1969). Creative Person and Creative Process, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
6. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1. Cognitive Domain, McKay, New York.
7. Bloom, B. S. (1963). Report on creativity research by the examiner's office of the University of Chicago. In Taylor C. W. and Barron, F. (Eds.), Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development Wiley, New York.
8. Bloom, B. S., (Ed.) (1985). Developing Talent in Young People, Ballantine Books, New York.
9. Bloom, B. S. and Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development vs. schooling. Educational Leadership, 38: 86-94.
10. Brandwein, P. F-. (1955). The Gifted Student as Future Scientist, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
11. Brandwein, P. F-. (1981). Memorandum: On Renewing Schooling and Education, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
12. Brandwein, P. F-. (1995). Science Talent in the Young Expressed within Ecologies of Achievement, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
13. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67: 380-400.
14. Chambers, J. A. (1969). A multidimensional theory of creativity. Psychological Reports 25: 779-799.
15. Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic Studies of Genius: Vol. 2. The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
16. Dellas, M., and Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73: 55-73.
17. Freeman, F. S. (1962). Theory and Practice of Psychological Testing, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.
18. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind, Basic Books, New York.
19. Guilford, J. P. (1964). Some new looks at the nature of creative processes. In Fredrickson, M. and Gilliksen, H. (Eds.), Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
20. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York.
21. Harmon, L. R. (1963). The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In Taylor, C. W., and Barron, F. (Eds.), Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development. Wiley, New York.
22. Helson, R., and Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average Ph.D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 34: 250-257.
23. Holland, J. L., and Astin, A. W. (1962). The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology 53: 182-183.
24. Hoyt, D. P. (1965). The Relationship Between College Grades and Adult Achievement: A Review of the Literature (Research Report No. 7). American College Testing Program, Iowa City.
25. Hudson, L. (1960). Degree class and attainment in scientific research. British Journal of Psychology 51: 67-73.
26. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist 17: 484-495.
27. MacKinnon, D. W. (1964). The creativity of architects. In Taylor C. W. (Ed.), Widening Horizons in Creativity. Wiley, New York.
28. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist 20: 273-281.
29. McCurdy, H. G. (1960). The childhood pattern of genius. Horizon 2: 33-38.
30. McNemar, Q. (1964). Lost: Our intelligence? Why? American Psychologist 19: 871-882.
31. Mednick, M. T. (1963). Research creativity in psychology graduate students. Journal of Consulting Psychology 27: 265-266.
32. Munday, L. A., and Davis, J. C. (1974). Varieties of Accomplishment after College: Perspectives on the Meaning of Academic Talent. (Research Report No. 62). American College Testing Program, Iowa City.
33. Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. and Detterman, D. K. (Eds.), Human Intelligence, Ablex, Norwood, NJ. pp. 179-189.
34. Nicholls, J. C. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist 27: 717-727.
35. Oden, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-year follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic Psychology Monograph 77: 3-93.
36. Parloff, M. B., Datta, L., Kleman, M., and Handlon, J. H. (1968). Personality characteristics which differentiate creative male adolescents and adults. Journal of Personality 36: 528-552.
37. Reis, S. M., and Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Using curriculum compacting to challenge the above-average. Educational Leadership 50(2): 51-57.
38. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A Guide for Developing Defensible Programs for the Gifted and Talented, Creative Learning Press, Mansfield Center, Conn.
39. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan 60: 180-184, 261.
40. Renzulli, J. S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly 26(4): 148-156.
41. Renzulli, J. S. (1983). Guiding the gifted in the pursuit of real problems: The transformed role of the teacher. The Journal of Creative Behavior 17(1): 49-59.
42. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftendness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 332-357.
43. Renzulli, J. S., and Reis, S. M. (1997). The School Wide Enrichment Model: A How-To Guide for Educational Excellence, Creative Learning Press, Mansfield Center, Conn.
44. Renzulli, J. S. and Reis, S. M. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Model. Gifted Child Quarterly 38: 2-14.
45. Renzulli, J. S., Reis, S. M., and Smith, L. H. (1981). The Revolving Door Identification Model, Creative Learning Press, Mansfield Center, Conn.
46. Renzulli, J. S., and Smith, L. H. (1978). The Learning Style Inventory: A Measure of Student Preference for Instructional Techniques, Creative Learning Press, Mansfield Center, Conn.
47. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., and Reis, S. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Journal 82: 185-194.
48. Richards, J. M., Jr., Holland, J. L., and Lutz, S. W. (1967). Prediction of student accomplishment in college. Journal of Educational Psychology 58: 343-355.
49. Roe, A. (1952). The Making of a Scientist, Dodd, Mead, New York.
50. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday, New York.
51. Shapiro, R. J. (1968). Creative research scientists. Psychologia Africana (suppl 4).
52. Stein, M. 1.(1968). Creativity. In Borgatta, E. and Lambert, W. W. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.
53. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 1-16.
54. Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Lies we live by: Misapplication of tests in identifying the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly 26(4): 157-161.
55. Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2): 269-316.
56. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development 31: 197-224.
57. Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (1982, June). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today 16: 37-44.
58. Sternberg, R. J. and Lubart, T. I. (1992). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development 34: 1-31.
59. Terman, L. M., et al. (1926). Genetic Studies of Genius: Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children, 2nd ed, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
60. Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist 9: 221-230.
61. Terman, L. M. and Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
62. Thorndike, E. L. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology 12: 124-127.
63. Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly 13: 223-229.
64. Vernon, P. E. (1967). Psychological studies of creativity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 8: 153-164.
65. Walberg, H. J. (1969). A portrait of the artist and scientist as young men. Exceptional Children 35: 5-12.
66. Walberg, H. J. (1971). Varieties of adolescent creativity and the high school environment. Exceptional Children 38: 111-116.
67. Wallach, M. A. (1976). Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist 64: 57-63.
68. Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969). The Talented Students: A Validation of the Creativity Intelligence Distinction, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
69. Ward, V. (1961). Educating the Gifted: An Axiomatic Approach. Merrill, Westerville, Ohio.
70. Weiner, P. P. (Ed.) (1973). Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Scribner's Sons, New York.
71. Werts, C. E. (1968). Paternal influence on career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology 15: 48-52.
72. Witty, P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In Henry, N. B. (Ed.), Education of the Gifted. Fifty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
73. Zuckerman, H. (1979). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates' mutual influences. In Albert, R. S. (Ed.), Genius and Eminence, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, pp. 241-252.