Implementation of the Child Care and Development Block Grant: A research synthesis

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 239.e1-239.e6

  Cohen, Sally S ^a,b   Lord, Heather ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844548829     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. S.S. Cohen Championing child care 2001 Columbia University Press New York, NY
2. Gish M. Child Care: Funding and spending under federal block grants. [monograph on the Internet]. Washington: Congressional Research Service Report for Congress; 2002. Available from http://www.nccic.org/pubs/crsreport/ crsreport.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2005.
3. J. Mezey, B. Richie Welfare dollars no longer an increasing source of child care funding 2003 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
4. S.S. Cohen, B.L. Misuraca PNPs as catalysts in child care policymaking J Ped Health Care 15 2001 49 57
5. A. Alkon, K. Sokal-Guttierrez, M. Wolff Practice applications of research. Child care health consultation improves health knowledge and compliance Pediatr Nurs 28 2002 61-52
6. A.A. Crowley Child care health consultation an ecological model J Society Pediatr Nurs 6 2001 170 181
7. S. Cohen Child care a crucial legislative issue J Pediatr Health Care 18 2004 312 314
8. Ewen D, Greenberg M. (Center for Law and Social Policy). Comments regarding changes to the matching requirements in the Child Care and Development Block Grant. Washington, DC: Jan 11, 2005. Available at: http://www.clasp.org/ publications/ccdbg_comments.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2005.
9. H. Cooper Synthesizing research A guide for literature reviews 3rd ed. 1998 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
10. J. Garrard Health sciences literature review made easy The matrix method 1999 Aspen Publishers, Inc Gaithersburg, MD
11. J. Mezey, R. Schumacher, M. Greenberg, J. Lombardi, J. Hutchins Unfinished agenda Child care for low-income families since 1996 - Implications for federal and state policy 2002 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
12. General Accounting Office (GAO). Child Care: States increased spending on low income families. Report No.: 01-293, Washington, DC: GAO.
13. M. Greenberg, S. Savner The final TANF regulations a preliminary analysis 1999 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
14. R. Schumacher, M. Greenberg, J. Duffy The impact of TANF funding on state child care subsidy programs 2001 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
15. US Department of Health and Human Services [homepage on the Internet]. Washington, DC: Child Care Bureau. Access to child care for low-income working families. Available at http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/ccb/research/ccreport/ ccreport.htm. Accessed September 15, 2005.
16. US Department of Health and Human Services. Child Care and Development Fund Report to Congress. Final Report. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families; 2003. Available at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ccb/ policy1/congressreport/CCDBGreport.pdf. Accessed Sep-tember 15, 2005.
17. S. Burkhardt, O. Goldon, E. Karokik, L. Stoney Child Care and Development Fund. Report of state plans FY Final report 2002-2003 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families Washington, DC
18. Karolak, E (National Child Care Information Center, Washington, DC). Trends in state eligibility policies: A CCDBG issue brief. Washington, DC, Collins Management Consulting, Inc. Contract No.: 233-01-0011. Sponsored by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Child Care Bureau.
19. A.M. Collins, J.I. Layzer, J.L. Kreader, A. Werner, F.B. Glantz National study of child care for low-income families. State and community substudy interim report 2000 Abt Associates Bethesda, MD Report No 11-02. Sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families
20. Meyers MK, Peck LR, Davis EE, Collins A, Weber R, Schexnayder DT, Schroeder DG, et al. (National Center for Children in Poverty, NY). The dynamics of child care subsidy use: A collaborative study of five states. Washington, DC: Child Care Bureau.
21. General Accounting Office (GAO) Child Care States have undertaken a variety of quality improvement initiatives, but more evaluations of effectiveness are needed 2002 GAO Washington, DC Report No.: 02-897
22. L. Frame, J.D. Berrick The effects of welfare reform on families involved with public child welfare services results from a qualitative study Children and Youth Ser Rev 25 2003 113 138
23. Stoney L, Stanton N. Child Care and Development Fund: report of state plans for the period of 10/1/99-9/30/01. Final report. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
24. US Department of Health and Human Services. Child Care and Development Block Grant: report of state plans for the period 10/1/97-9/30/99. Final report. Washington, DC.
25. R. Schumacher, M. Greenberg Child care after leaving welfare early evidence from state studies 2001 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
26. Wilkins A. Child care experiences of former TANF recipients. Washington, DC: Welfare Reform Project. Sponsored by National Conference of State Legislatures. Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/statefed/welfare/ccbrief.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2005.
27. P. Loprest Use of government benefits increases among families leaving welfare Snapshots of America's Families III series, No. 6 2003 Urban Institute Washington DC Available at: http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310838. Accessed September 15, 2005
28. General Accounting Office (GAO) 2002 Child Care: states exercise flexibility in setting reimbursement rates and providing access for low-income children Washington, DC Report No.: 02-894
29. D. Ewen, K. Hart State developments in child care, early education and school-age care 2002 2002 Children's Defense Fund Washington, DC
30. M. Greenberg, J. Mezey, R. Schumacher Child care funding the story since 1996, the challenges in reauthorization 2003 Paper at National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies Conference Washington, DC
31. S.W. Helburn, B.R. Bergmann America's child care problem the way out 2002 Palgrave MacMillan New York, NY
32. General Accountability Office (GAO) 2004 Child Care: state efforts to enforce safety and health requirements Washington, DC Report No.: 04-786
33. B. Fuller, S.L. Kagan, S. Loeb, Y.-W. Chang Child care quality centers and home settings that serve poor families Early Childhood Research Quarterly 19 2004 505 527
34. R. Schumacher, K. Irish, M. Greenberg Untapped potential? How states contract directly with providers to shore up child care choices for low-income families 2003 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
35. R. Schumacher, M. Greenberg, J. Lombardi State initiatives to promote early learning Next steps in coordinating subsidized child care, Head Start and State Prekindergarten 2001 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC
36. Schumacher R, Irish K, Lombardi J. Meeting great expectations: integrating early education program standards in child care. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy; 2003. Available at http://www.clasp.org/ publicationmeeting_rpt.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2005.
37. Shlay AB, Weinraub M, Harmon M, Tran H. (Temple University, Center for Public Policy, Philadelphia, PA). Barriers to subsidies: reasons why low-income families do not use child care subsidies. Washington, DC: Funded by Administration of Children, Youth and Families. Grant No.: 90YE0019102.
38. Vandell DL, Wolfe B. Child care quality: does it matter and does it need to be improved? Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000 May. Available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/ccquality00/index.htm. Accessed September 15, 2005.
39. The most comprehensive study on the linkages among child care structure, processes and outcomes is the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Study of Early Care and Youth Development. Available at http://secc.rti.org/. Accessed September 15, 2005.
40. R.L. Coley, P.L. Chase-Landsdale Child Care in the era of welfare reform Quality, choices and preferences Policy Brief 01-4 2001 Welfare, Children & Families: a three city study, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore (MD)
41. Lav I, Johnson N. State budget deficits for fiscal year 2004 are huge and growing. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; 2003.
42. J. Mezey Five reasons why the Senate should adopt the Snowe-Dodd amendment to increase child care funding 2004 Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC Available at: http://www.clasp.org/publications/snowe.pdf
43. J. Kaplan Child care funding and policy issues Reauthorization Notes 2002 [serial on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.financeprojectinfo.org/ Publication/childcarefundingpolicyissues_trn.htm. Accessed September 15, 2005