Optimal communication vocabularies and heterogeneous ontologies

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3396, Issue , 2005, Pages 76-90

  Van Diggelen, Jurriaan ^a   Beun, Robbert Jan ^a   Dignum, Frank ^a   Van Eijk, Rogier M ^a   Meyer, John Jules ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

COMMUNICATION VOCABULARY; HETEROGENEITY; HETEROGENEOUS ONTOLOGIES; ONTOLOGY;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 26844546726     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32258-0_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. FIPA ACL Message Structure Specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/ fipa00061/.
2. FIPA Ontology Service Specification, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00086/ .
3. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
4. F. Baader, D.L. McGuinnes, and P.F. Patel-Schneider. The description logic hand-book: Theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
5. M. Burnstein, D. McDermott, D.R. Smith, and S.J. Westfold. Derivation of glue code for agent interoperation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 6(3):265-286, 2003.
6. P. Doherty, W. Lukaszewicz, and A. Szalas. On mutual understanding among communicating agents. Proceedings of the Workshop on Formal Approaches to Multi-Agent Systems (FAMA '03), pages 83-97, 2003.
7. T. Finin, R. Fritzson, D. McKay, and R. McEntire. KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In N. Adam, B. Bhargava, and Y. Yesha, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'94), pages 456-463, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1994. ACM Press.
8. R. Jasper and M. Uschold. A framework for understanding and classifying ontology applications. Proceedings of the IJCAI99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5), 1999.
9. Stanford University Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Ontolingua. http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/software/ontolingua/.
10. M. Luck, P. McBurney, and C. Preist. Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing. Agent link community, 2003.
11. D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. The chimaera ontology environment. Proceedings of the The Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000).
12. Natalya Fridman Noy and Mark A. Musen. Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2000.
13. N.R. Jennings. On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence, 2000.
14. M. Obitko and V. Marik. Mapping between ontologies in agent communication. In Proceedings of the CEEMAS 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence 2691, pages 191-203. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
15. Luc Steels. The origins of ontologies and communication conventions in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(2):169-194, 1998.
16. B. Swartout, R. Patil, K. Knight, and T. Russ. Toward distributed use of large-scale ontologies. Proceedings of the Tenth Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-based Systems Workshop, 1996.
17. Y. Tzitzikas and C. Meghini. Ostensive automatic schema mapping for taxonomy-based peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, Helsinki, Finland, 2003.
18. M. Uschold. Where is the semantics in the semantic web? Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems (OAS) at the 5th Int. Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001.
19. A.B. Williams. Learning to share meaning in a multi-agent system. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8(2): 165-193, 2004.