Argumentation in Bayesian belief networks

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3366, Issue , 2005, Pages 111-129

  Vreeswijk, Gerard A W ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS;

ADMISSIBILITY SEMANTICS; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FORMAL ARGUMENTATION;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 26844542042     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. V. Carofiglio. Modelling argumentation with belief networks. In F. Grasso, Chris Reed, and Giuseppe Carenini, editors, Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA-2004), 2004.
2. G.I. Chesñevar, A.G. Maguitman, and R.P. Loui. Logical models of argument. ACM Comput. Surv., 32(4):337-383, 2000.
3. G.F. Cooper. The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42:393-405, 1990.
4. R.G. Cowell, A.P. Dawid, S.L. Lauritzen, and D.J. Spiegelhalter. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
5. Phan Minh Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-357, 1995.
6. Jürgen Kohlas. Probabilistic argumentation systems a new way to combine logic with probability. Journal of Applied Logic, 1(3-4):225-253, 2003.
7. Jürgen Kohlas and Rolf Haenni. Assumption-based reasoning and probabilistic argumentation systems. In Jürgen Kohlas and S. Moral, editors, Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems: Algorithms. Oxford University Press, 1996.
8. Kevin B. Korb and Ann E. Nicholson. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. Chapman and Hall/CRC Computer Science and Data Analysis, 2003.
9. S.L. Lauritzen and D.J. Spiegelhalter. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 50:157-224, 1988.
10. Richard McConachy, Kevin B. Korb, and Ingrid Zuckerman. A Bayesian approach to automating argumentation. In David M. W. Powers, editor, Proc. of the Joint Conf. on New Methods in Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning: NeMLaP3/CoNLL98, pages 91-100. Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerset, New Jersey, 1998.
11. J. D. Park. Map complexity results and approximation methods. Proc. of the 18th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pages 388-396, 2002.
12. Judea Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, Inc., Palo Alto CA, 2 edition, 1994.
13. John L. Pollock. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
14. John L. Pollock. Implementing defeasible reasoning. Presented at the Computational Dialectics Workshop, at FAPR'96, June 3-7, 1996, Bonn. Cf. http://nathan.gmd.de/ projects/zeno/fapr/programme.html., 1996.
15. John L. Pollock. Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 133(1-2):233-282, 2001.
16. H. Prakken and Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk. Logics for defeasible argumentation. In D.M. Gabbay et al., editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pages 219-318. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002.
17. S. Saha and S. Sen. A bayes net approach to argumentation based negotiation. In Proc. of the AAMAS-2004 workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS-2004), 2004.
18. S. E. Shimony. Finding maps for belief networks is np-hard. Artificial Intelligence, 68:399-410, 1994.
19. G.R. Simari and R.P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible argumentation and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125-157, 1992.
20. Stephen Toulmin. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
21. H. Bart Verheij. Accrual of arguments in defeasible argumentation. In C. Witteveen, W. van der Hoek, J.-J. Ch. Meyer, and B. van Linder, editors, Proc. of the 2nd Dutch/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pages 217-224, Utrecht, 1995.
22. G. Vreeswijk and Prakken H. Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics. In M. OjedarAciego, I.P. de Guzman, G. Brewka, and L.M. Pereira, editors, Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Inteligence (JELIA 2000), volume 1919 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 239-253. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2000.
23. Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk. IACAS: An implementation of Chisholm's principles of knowledge. In C. Witteveen, W. van der Hoek, J.-J. Ch. Meyer, and B. van Linder, editors, The Proc. of the 2nd Dutch/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pages 225-234, Utrecht, 1995. Delft University of Technology, University of Utrecht.
24. Nevin Lianwen Zhang and David Poole. Exploiting causal independence in bayesian network inference. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 5:301-328, 1996.
25. I. Zukerman, R. McConachy, K. B. Korb, and D. Pickett. Exploratory interaction with a bayesian argumentation system. In T. Dean, editor, Proc. of the 16th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), pages 1294-1299. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.