The development of activity-based costing journal literature, 1987-2000

European Accounting Review

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 481-508

  Bjørnenak, Trond ^a   Mitchell, Falconer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844528919     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963818022000001019     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abrahamson, E., 1991. “ Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovation' ”. In Academy of Management Review 586–612.
2. Bjørnenak, T., 1997. “ Diffusion and accounting: the case of ABC in Norway ”. In Management Accounting Research 3–17.
3. Bradford, M. G., and Kent, W. A., 1977. “ Human Geography ”. In Theories and Their Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bright, J., Davis, R. E., Downes, C. A., and Sweeting, R. C., 1992. “ The developments of costing techniques and practices: a UK study ”. In Management Accounting Research 201–211.
5. Bromwich, M., 1998. “ Editorial: value based financial management system ”. In Management Accounting Research 387–389.
6. Brown, L. A., 1981. Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective, London: Methuen.
7. Carsberg, B., 1975. The Economics of Business Decisions, London: Penguin.
8. Clark, P. J., Hall, N. T., and Stevens, K., 1999. “ Activity-based costing in Ireland ”. In Barriers to, and opportunities for, change’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 443–468.
9. Cooper, R., 1985. “ Schrader-Bellow ”. In Harvard Business School Cases. Nos. 1-186-050, 051, 052 054–055.
10. Cooper, R., 1988. The rise of activity-based costing–Part Two: when do I need an activity-based cost system?. Journal of Cost Management, 1 Fall: 41–48.
11. Cooper, R., and Kaplan, R. S., 1991. Profit priorities from activity based costing. Harvard Business Review, 69 May–June: 130–135.
12. Datar, S., and Gupta, M., 1994. Aggregation, specification and measurement errors in product costing. Accounting Review, 69: 567–591.
13. Dolinsky, L. R., and Vollman, T. E., 1991. Transaction-based overhead considerations for product design. Journal of Cost Management, 5 Summer: 7–19.
14. Dunk, A. S., 1989. “ Management accounting lag ”. In Abacus 149–155.
15. Foster, G., and Gupta, M., 1990. Manufacturing overhead cost driver analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13: 309–337.
16. Foster, G., and Swenson, D. W., 1997. Measuring the success of activity based cost management and its determinant. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9: 109–142.
17. Garner, S. P., 1954. Evolution of Cost Accounting to 1925, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
18. Gosselin, M., Bandwagon theories: some explanations for the activity based costing paradox. EIASM Workshop on Manufacturing Accounting. Edinburgh.
19. Hagerstrand, T., 1967. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Holford, D., and McAulay, L., 1987. “ Activity-based accounting in the National Health Service ”. In Management Accounting (UK) 26–30.
21. Horngren, C. T., 1990. First discussant. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2: 21–24.
22. Hussey, R., and Cottingham, J., 1999. “ The professional accounting journals and the academic author ”. In ACCA Occasional Research Paper No. 25, London: Association of Certified Accountants.
23. Innes, J., and Mitchell, F., 1995. “ A survey of activity based costing in the UK's largest companie' ”. In Management Accounting Research 137–153.
24. Innes, J., Mitchell, F., and Sinclair, D., 2000. “ Activity-based costing the UK's largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey result' ”. In Management Accounting Research 349–362.
25. Johnson, H. T., 1992. Relevance Regained, New York: The Free Press.
26. Kaplan, R. S., 1987. John Deere component work. Harvard Business School Cases. Nos. 9-187, 108.
27. Kee, R., 1995. Integrating activity-based costing with the theory of constraints to enhance production-related decision making. Accounting Horizons, 9 December: 48–61.
28. Lukka, K., and Granlund, M., 2002. The fragmented communication structure within the accounting academia: the case of activity-based costing research genre. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27: 165–190.
29. Lukka, K., and Kasanen, E., 1996. Is accounting a global or local discipline? Evidence from major research journal. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21: 755–773.
30. MacArthur, J. B., and Stranahan, H. A., 1998. Cost drivers in hospitals: a simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10: 279–312.
31. Macintosh, N. B., 1998. “ Management accounting Europe: a view from Canada ”. In Management Accounting Research 495–500.
32. McGowan, A. S., and Klammer, T. P., 1997. Satisfaction with activity-based cost management implementation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9: 217–238.
33. Malmi, T., 1997. “ Towards explaining activity-based costing failure: accounting and control in a decentralised organisation ”. In Management Accounting Research 459–480.
34. Malmi, T., 1999. Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms’;. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24: 649–672.
35. Morill, R., Gaile, G. L., and Thrall, G. I., 1988. Spatial Diffusion, London: Sage.
36. Noreen, E., 1987. “ Commentary on Johnson & Kaplan's relevance lost ”. In Accounting Horizons 110–116.
37. Noreen, E., 1991. Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant cost. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3: 159–168.
38. Panozzo, F., 1997. The making of the good academic accountant. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22: 447–480.
39. Prather, J., and Rueschoff, N., 1996. An analysis of international accounting research in US academic accounting journals 1980 through 1993. Accounting Horizons, 10: 1–17.
40. Shank, J. K., and Govindarajan, V., 1988. The perils of cost allocation based on production volume. Accounting Horizons, 2 December: 71–79.
41. Shields, M., 1995. An empirical analysis of firm’ implementation experiences with activity based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7: 1–28.
42. Shields, M., 1997. Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9: 3–61.
43. Solomons, D., 1965. “ Divisional Performance ”. In Measurement and Control, Illinois: Irwin.
44. Staubus, G. J., 1990. “ Activity costing: twenty years on ”. In Management Accounting Research 249–264.
45. Swenson, D., 1995. The benefits of activity-based cost management to the manufacturing industry. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7: 167–180.
46. Watts, R. L., and Zimmerman, J. L., 1979. The demand for and supply of accounting theories: the market for excuse. Accounting Review, 54: 273–305.