Towards fault-tolerant massively multiagent systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3446 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 55-69

  Guessoum, Zahia ^a,b   Briot, Jean Pierre ^a   Faci, Nora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

FAULT-TOLERANCE; PROTOTYPE ARCHITECTURE; REPLICAS; REPLICATION STRATEGIES;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 26844525962     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11512073_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. M. Bertier, O. Marin, and P. Sens. Implementation and performance evaluation of an adaptable failure detector. In the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Washington, USA, 2002.
2. A. Fedoruk and R. Deters. Improving fault-tolerance by replicating agents. In AAMAS2002, pages 373-744, Bologna, Italy, 2002.
3. FIPA. Agent communication language, foundation for intelligent physical agents, Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.cselt.stet.it/ufv/leonardo/fipa/index. htm, 1997.
4. M. Golm. Metaxa and the future of reflection. In OOPSLA - Workshop on Reflective Programming in C++ and Java, pages 238-256, 1998.
5. R. Guerraoui, B. Garbinato, and K. Mazouni. Lessons from designing and implementing GARF. In Object-Based Parallel and Distributed Computation, number 791 in LNCS, pages 238-256, 1995.
6. Z. Guessoum and J.-P. Briot. From active objects to autonomous agents. IEEE Concurrency, 7(3):68-76, 1999.
7. Z. Guessoum, J.-P. Briot, and S. Charpentier. Dynamic and adaptative replication for large-scale reliable multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the ICSE'02 First International Workshop on Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems (SELMAS'02), Orlando FL, U.S.A., may 2002. ACM.
8. S. Hagg. A sentinel approach to fault handling in multi-agent systems. In C. Zhang and D. Lukose, editors, Multi-Agent Systems, Methodologies and Applications, number 1286 in LNCS, pages 190-195, 1997.
9. G. A. Kaminka, D. V. Pynadath, and M. Tambe. Monitoring teams by overhearing: A multi-agent plan-recognition approach. Journal of Intelligence Artificial Research, 17:83-135, 2002.
10. S. Kraus, V.S. Subrahmanian, and N. Cihan Tacs. Probabilistically survivable MASs. In IJCAI'03, pages 789-795, 2003.
11. J. J. Odell, H. V. Dyke Parunak, and B. Bauer. Representing agent interaction protocols in UML. In Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 121-140, 2000.
12. P. De Assis Silva and R. Popescu-Zeletin. An approach for providing mobile agent fault tolerance. In S. N. Maheshwari, editor, Second International Workshop on Mobile Agents, number 1477 in LNCS, pages 14-25. Springer Verlag, 1998.
13. L. Silva, V. Batista, and J. Silva. Fault-tolerant execution of mobile agents. In International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, pages 135-143, 2000.
14. R. van Renesse, K. Birman, and S. Maffeis. Horus: A flexible group communication system. Communications of the ACM, 39(4):76-83, 1996.