'SEM-EDS analysis and discrimination of forensic soil' by Cengiz et al.: A comment [1] (multiple letters)

Forensic Science International

Volumn 155, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 222-224

  Bull, P A ^a   Morgan, R M ^a   Dunkerley, S ^a   Wilson, H E ^b   Cengiz, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEDIMENT; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 26844522411     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.07.017     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. S. Cengiz A. Cengiz Karaca I. Cakir H. Bulent Uner A. Sevindik SEM-EDS analysis and discrimination of forensic soil Forensic Sci. Int. 141 2004 33 37
2. D.J. Croft K. Pye Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation Sci. Justice 44 1 2004 21 28
3. M.O. Finkelstein W.B. Fairley A Bayesian approach to identification evidence Harvard Law Rev. 83 1970 489 517
4. I.W. Evett Interpretation: a personal odyssey C.G.G. Aitken D.A. Stoney Forward to ‘The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science’ 1991 Ellis Horward
5. M.M. Houck Mute Witnesses Trace Evidence Analysis 2001 Academic Press
6. H.E. Wilson, 2004. Chemical and Textural Analysis of Soils and Sediments in Forensic Investigations. University of London, PhD Thesis (unpublished).
7. M.M. Houck, 1999. Statistics and Trace Evidence: The Tyranny of Numbers, Forensic Science Communications 1 (3) Available at http://www.fbi.gov/ .