Evaluation and NLP

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3588, Issue , 2005, Pages 626-632

  Nakache, Didier ^a,b   Metais, Elisabeth ^a   Timsit, Jean François ^c  

^a University of Paris Cité   (France)

^b CRAMIF   (France)

^c GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Categorization; Classification; Evaluation; Measure; NLP

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SCIENCE; EVALUATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SEMANTICS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BINARY LOGIC; CATEGORIZATION; K-MEASURE; NLP; BREAK-EVEN POINT; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; EVALUATION; MEASURE; NEW APPROACHES; PRECISION AND RECALL; USER REQUIREMENTS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 26844512507     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11546924_61     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. [Budanitsky 2001] A. Budanitsky and G. Hirst: "Semantic distance inWordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures" Department of Computer Science Univ. of Toronto
2. [Saracevic 70] Tefko Saracevic, "Introduction to Information Science", 111-151. New York: R.R. Bowker, 1970. Chap. 3: The concept of "relevance" in information science: A historical review.
3. [Sparck Jones. 2001] K. Sparck Jones. "Automatic language and information processing: Rethinking evaluation". Natural Language Engineering, 7(1):29-46. 2001
4. [Van Rijsbergen 79] K. Van Rijsbergen, "Information Retrieval", (2nd Ed.) Butterworths, London. www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith/Preface.html
5. [Voorhees 2003] E. M. Voorhees: "Evaluating the Evaluation: Edmonton", May-June 2003. Main Papers, pp. 181-188. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003