Conditioning channel meanders to well observations

Mathematical Geology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 185-201

  Oliver, Dean S ^a  

^a The University of Tulsa Tulsa   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditional simulation; Fluvial model; Geologic model; Stochastic model; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; NUMERICAL METHOD; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION;

EID: 26844507848     PISSN: 08828121     EISSN: 15738868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014464202497     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bi, Z., Oliver, D. S., and Reynolds, A. C., 2000, Conditioning 3D stochastic channels to pressure data: SPE J., v. 5, no. 4, p. 474-484.
2. Deutsch, C. V., and Wang, L., 1996, Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs: Math. Geol., v. 28, no. 7, p. 857-880.
3. Furbish, D. J., 1991, Spatial autoregressive structure in meander evolution: Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., v. 103, p. 1576-1589.
4. Georgsen, F., Egeland, T., Knarud, R., and Omre, H., 1994, Conditional simulation of facies architecture in fluvial reservoirs, in Armstrong M., and Dowd, P. A., eds., Geostatistical simulations: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 235-250.
5. Georgsen, F., and Omre, H., 1993, Combining fibre processes and Gaussian random functions for modelling fluvial reservoirs, in Soares, A., ed., Proceedings: Geostatistics Tróia '92: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 425-439.
6. Gross, L. J., and Small, M. J., 1998, River and floodplain process simulation for subsurface characterization: Water Resources Res., v. 34, no. 9, p. 2365-2376.
7. Holden, L., Hauge, R., Skare, Ø., and Skorstad, A., 1998, Modeling of fluvial reservoirs with object models: Math. Geol., v. 30, no. 5, p. 473-496.
8. Howard, A., 1996, Modelling channel evolution and floodplain morphology, in Floodplain processes: Wiley, New York, p. 15-62.
9. Langbein, W. B., and Leopold, L. B., 1966, River meanders - theory of minimum variance: U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 422-H.
10. McLaughlin, D., and Townley, L. R., 1996, A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem: Water Resources Res., v. 32, no. 5, p. 1131-1161.
11. Oliver, D. S., 1998, Calculation of the inverse of the covariance: Math. Geology, v. 30, no. 7, p. 911-933.
12. Oliver, D. S., He, N., and Reynolds, A. C., 1996, Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data, in European conference for the mathematics of oil recovery, vol. V, p. 1-11.
13. Shmaryan, L. E., and Deutsch, C. V., 1999, Object-based modeling of fluvial/deepwater reservoirs with fast data conditioning: Methodology and case studies, in Proceedings of the 1999 SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, SPE 56821.
14. Skorstad, A., Hauge, R., and Holden, L., 1999, Well conditioning in a fluvial reservoir model: Math. Geology, v. 31, no. 7, p. 857-872.
15. Sun, T., Meakin, P., Jøssang, T., and Schwarz, K., 1996, A simulation model for meandering rivers: Water Resources Res., v. 32, no. 9, p. 2937-2954.
16. Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation: Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 613 p.
17. Viseur, S., Shtuka, A., and Mallet, J.-L., 1998, New fast, stochastic, Boolean simulation of fluvial deposits, in Proceedings of the 1998 SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, SPE 49281.