Proton transfer in nanoconfined polar solvents. II. Adiabatic proton transfer dynamics

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 109, Issue 38, 2005, Pages 18201-18208

  Thompson, Ward H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUANTUM THEORY; SOLVENTS;

HYDROPHOBIC SPHERICAL CAVITY; PROTON TRANSFER; PROTON VIBRATION; REACTION DYNAMICS;

PROTONS;

EID: 26844507337     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp053043g     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Brinker, C. J.; Scherer, G. W. Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing; Academic Press: New York, 1990.
2. MacGillivray, L. R.; Atwood, J. L. Adv. Supramol. Chem. 2000, 6, 157-183.
3. MacGillivray, L. R.; Atwood, J. L. J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 152, 199-210.
4. Atwood, J. L.; Barbour, L. J.; Ness, T. J.; Raston, C. L.; Raston, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7192-7193.
5. Cave, G. W. V.; Antesberger, J.; Barbour, L. J.; McKinlay, R. M.; Atwood, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5263-5266.
6. Steed, J. W.; Atwood, J. L. Supramolecular Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 2000.
7. Rebek, J., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 278-286.
8. Gissot, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7424-7425.
9. Amaya, T.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14149-14156.
10. Palmer, L. C.; Rebek, J., Jr. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3051-3059.
11. Avram, L.; Cohen, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11556-11563.
12. Kaanumalle, L. S.; Gibb, C. L. D.; Gibb, B. C.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14366-14367.
13. See, e.g., Fendler, J. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 1485-1491 and
14. Pileni, M. P., Ed. Structure and Reactivity in Reverse Micelles; Elsevier: New York, 1989.
15. See, e.g., Gu, L.-Q.; Cheley, S.; Bayley, H. Science 2001, 291, 636-640.
16. Ping, G.; Yuan, J. M.; Vallieres, M.; Dong, H.; Sun, Z.; Wei, Y.; Li, F. Y.; Lin, S. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 8042-8048.
17. Friedel, M.; Sheeler, D. J.; Shea, J.-E. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 8106-8113.
18. Brown, D.; Clarke, J. H. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 2881-2888.
19. Linse, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 4992-5004.
20. Linse, P.; Halle, B. Mol. Phys. 1989, 67, 537-573.
21. Zhang, J.; Jonas, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8812-8815.
22. Korb, J.-P.; Xu, S.; Jonas, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 2411-2422.
23. Korb, J.-P.; Malier, L.; Cros, F.; Xu, S.; Jonas, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 2312-2315.
24. Korb, J.-P.; Xu, S.; Cros, F.; Malier, L.; Jonas, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 4044-4050.
25. Loughnane, B. J.; Fourkas, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 10288-10294.
26. Loughnane, B. J.; Scodinu, A.; Fourkas, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 6061-6068.
27. Loughnane, B. J.; Fairer, R. A.; Scodinu, A.; Reilly, T.; Fourkas, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 5421-5429.
28. Farrer, R. A.; Fourkas, J. T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 605-612.
29. Tobias, D. J.; Klein, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 6637-6648.
30. Senapati, S.; Keiper, J. S.; DeSimone, J. M.; Wignall, G. D.; Melnichenko, Y. B.; Frielinghaus, H.; Berkowitz, M. L. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7371-7376.
31. Senapati, S.; Berkowitz, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 1937-1944.
32. Senapati, S.; Berkowitz, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12906-12916.
33. Senapati, S.; Chandra, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 5106-5109.
34. Turner, C. H.; Brennan, J. K.; Johnson, J. K.; Gubbins, K. E. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 2138-2148.
35. Streck, C.; Mel'nichenko, Y. B.; Richert, R. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 53, 5341-5347.
36. Richert, R. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 15762-15766.
37. Riter, R. E.; Willard, D. M.; Levinger, N. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 2705-2714.
38. Pant, D.; Riter, R. E.; Levinger, N. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 9995-10003.
39. Riter, R. E.; Undiks, E. P.; Kimmel, J. R.; Levinger, N. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7931-7938.
40. Willard, D. M.; Riter, R. E.; Levinger, N. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4151-4160.
41. Willard, D. M.; Levinger, N. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 11075-11080.
42. Pant, D.; Levinger, N. E. Langmuir 2000, 16, 10123-10130.
43. Riter, R. E.; Undiks, E. P.; Levinger, N. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6062-6067.
44. Riter, R. E.; Kimmel, J. R.; Undiks, E. P.; Levinger, N. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 107, 8292-8297.
45. Pal, S. K.; Sukul, D.; Mandal, D.; Sen, S.; Bhattacharyya, K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2613-2616.
46. Sarkar, N.; Das, K.; Datta, A.; Das, S.; Bhattacharyya, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10523-10527.
47. Bhattacharyya, K.; Bagchi, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 10603-10613.
48. Nandi, N.; Bagchi, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13914-13919.
49. Baumann, R.; Ferrante, C.; Deeg, F. W.; Bräuchle, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 5781-5791.
50. Baumann, R.; Ferrante, C.; Kneuper, E.; Deeg, F. W.; Bräuchle, C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 2422-2430.
51. Zhang, J.; Bright, F. V. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 7900-7907.
52. Hazra, P.; Sarkar, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 342, 303-311.
53. Senapati, S.; Chandra, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 1223-1230.
54. Faeder, J.; Ladanyi, B. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 1033-1046.
55. Faeder, J.; Ladanyi, B. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 11148-11158.
56. Laria, D.; Kapral, R. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 7712-7718.
57. Thompson, W. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 6618-6628.
58. Thompson, W. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 8125-8133.
59. Gomez, J. A.; Thompson, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 20144-20154.
60. Li, S.; Thompson, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 4941-4946.
61. Eyal, M.; Reisfeld, R.; Chernyak, V.; Kaczmarek, L.; Grabowska, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 176, 531-535.
62. McKiernan, J.; Simoni, E.; Dunn, B.; Zink, J. I. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1006-1009.
63. Dunn, B.; Zink, J. I. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 2280-2291.
64. Prosposito, P.; Marks, D.; Zhang, H.; Glasbeek, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 8894-8902.
65. Prosposito, P.; Marks, D.; Zhang, H.; Glasbeek, M. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 1999, 150, 385-389.
66. Nogami, M.; Nagao, R.; Cong, W.; Abe, Y. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 1998, 13, 933-936.
67. Nogami, M. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2004, 31, 359-364.
68. Daiko, Y.; Kasuga, T.; Nogami, M. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2004, 69, 149-155.
69. Carturan, S.; Quaranta, A.; Maggioni, G.; Vomiero, A.; Ceccato, R.; Della Mea, G. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2003, 26, 931-935.
70. Quaranta, A.; Carturan, S.; Maggioni, G.; Ceccato, R.; Della Mea, G. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 322, 1-6.
71. Cohen, B.; Huppert, D.; Solntsev, K. M.; Tsfadia, Y.; Nachliel, E.; Gutman, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7539-7547.
72. Umeto, H.; Abe, K.; Kawasaki, C.; Igarashi, T.; Sakurai, T. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2003, 156, 127-137.
73. Kwon, O.-H.; Jang, D.-J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8049-8052.
74. Das, S.; Datta, A.; Bhattacharyya, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3299-3304.
75. Mandai, D.; Pal, S. K.; Bhattacharyya, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 9710-9714.
76. Pal, S. K.; Mandal, D.; Bhattacharyya, K. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 11017-11023.
77. Bardez, E.; Goguillon, B.-T.; Keh, E.; Valeur, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 1909-1913.
78. Bardez, E.; Monnier, E.; Valeur, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5031-5036.
79. Valeur, B.; Bardez, E. In Structure and Reactivity in Reverse Micelles; Pileni, M. P., Ed.; Elsevier: New York, 1989.
80. Politi, M. J.; Chaimovich, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 282-287.
81. Marcus, R. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1964, 15, 155-196.
82. Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1984, 35, 437-480.
83. See, e.g.: Marcus, R. A. Proc. Electrochem. Soc. 1980, 80, 1-14.
84. Juanós i Timoneda, J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 10431-10442.
85. Geissler, P. L.; Dellago, C.; Chandler, D.; Hutter, J.; Parrinello, M. Science 2001, 291, 2121-2124.
86. Warshel, A. Computer Modelling of Chemical Reactions in Proteins and Solution; Wiley: New York, 1991.
87. Åqvist, J.; Warshel, A. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2523-2544.
88. Azzouz, H.; Borgis, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 7361-7375.
89. Azzouz, H.; Borgis, D. J. Mol Liq. 1995, 63, 89-107.
90. Hammes-Schiffer, S.; Tully, J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4567-4667.
91. Staib, A.; Borgis, D.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 2487-2505.
92. Bigot, B.; Costa-Cabral, B. J.; Rivail, J. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 3083-3094.
93. wall is the effective Lennard-Jones radius of the cavity wall) to approximately account for the excluded volume, a quantity that changes significantly with cavity size.
94. Borgis, D.; Tarjus, G.; Azzouz, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 3188-3191.
95. Borgis, D.; Tarjus, G.; Azzouz, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 390-400.
96. Laria, D.; Ciccotti, G.; Ferrario, M.; Kapral, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 378-388.
97. Colbert, D. T.; Miller, W. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 1982-1991.
98. Lanczos, C. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 1950, 45, 255-282.
99. Thompson, W. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 1059-1067.
100. Bond, S. D.; Leimkuhler, B. J.; Laird, B. B. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151, 114-134.
101. Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
102. Another choice would be to calculate the reactant population using a dividing surface in the proton coordinate (here, the proton expectation value). We have found that the reactant population defined in this way is identical to that obtained using a dividing surface in the solvent coordinate, eq 8. That is, the proton position fully tracks the solvent coordinate.
103. cav = 12 Å at ∼11-12 Å from the cavity wall is due to a single solvent molecule located in the center of the cavity. The small volumes of the histogram bins nearest the cavity center give the very large densities.
104. Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 891-898.
105. Cohen, A. O.; Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 4249-4256.
106. Marcus, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 7224-7225.
107. Kiefer, P. M.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 1834-1849; 1850-1861.
108. See, e.g., Carroll, F. A. Perspectives on Structure and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry; Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA, 1998.
109. 2 contributed. An accurate fit of this form likely requires more extensive data than presented in Figure 6.
110. Note that the percentage of nonreactive trajectories does not (and should not be expected to) precisely correspond to the equilibrium reactant populations given in Table 1. The equilibrium populations are obtained by fitting the time-dependent reaction population rather than counting trajectories, and those populations (unlike the percentages in Table 2) are based on only the solvent coordinate value.