Thurstone scaling via binary response regression

Statistical Methodology

Volumn 1, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 93-104

  Lipovetsky, Stan ^a   Conklin, W Michael ^a  

^a GfK Custom Research North America   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary response regression; Logit; Maximum likelihood; Paired comparisons; Probit; Thurstone scale

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844506945     PISSN: 15723127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.statmet.2004.04.001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. R.G.D. Allen Mathematical Economics 1960 Macmillan & Co London
2. G. Arminger C.C. Clogg M.E. Sobel Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences 1995 Plenum Press London, NY
3. S. Becker, and Y. Le Cun Improving the convergence of back-propagation learning with second order methods D.S. Touretzky G.E. Hinton T.J. Sejnowski Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School 1988 Morgan Kaufmann San Mateo, CA 29 37
4. E.A. Bender Mathematical Methods in Artificial Intelligence 2000 IEEE Computer Society Press Los Alamitos, CA
5. C.R. Blyth Some probability paradoxes in choice from among random alternatives Journal of the American Statistical Association 67 1972 366 373
6. R.D. Bock, and L.V. Jones The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice 1968 Holden-Day San Francisco, CA
7. R.A. Bradley, and M.E. Terry Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons Biometrika 39 1952 324 345
8. R.A. Bradley The rank analysis of incomplete block designs: II. Additional tables for the method of paired comparisons Biometrika 41 1954 502 537
9. J.M. Chambers, and T.J. Hastie Statistical Models in S 1992 Wadsworth and Brooks Pacific Grove, CA
10. M. Conklin, and S. Lipovetsky Efficient assessment of self-explicated importance using latent class Thurstone scaling The 10th Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum 1999 American Marketing Association Santa Fe, NM
11. H.E. Daniels Rank correlation and population models Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 12 1950 171 181
12. H.A. David, The Method of Pair Comparisons, 2nd ed, London, Griffin, 1988
13. A.L. Edwards Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction 1957 Appleton-Century-Crofts New York
14. D.M. Ennis, and N.L. Johnson Thurstone-Shepard similarity models as special cases of moment generating functions Mathematical Psychology 37 1993 104 110
15. L.R. Ford Solution of a ranking problem for binary comparisons The American Mathematical Monthly 64 1957 28 33
16. W.A. Glenn, and H.A. David Ties in paired-comparisons experiments using a modified Thurstone-Mosteller models Biometrics 16 1960 86 109
17. P.E. Green, and D.S. Tull Research for Marketing Decisions 1978 Prentice-Hall New Jersey
18. D.A. Harville The selection of seeding of college basketball or football teams for postseason competition Journal of the American Statistical Association 98 2003 17 27
19. T.J. Hastie, and R.J. Tibshirani Generalized Additive Models 1997 Chapman and Hall London, NY
20. S. Lipovetsky, and M. Conklin Dual priority-antipriority Thurstone scales as AHP eigenvectors Engineering Simulation 18 2001 631 648
21. S. Lipovetsky, and M. Conklin Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP European Journal of Operational Research 137 2002 110 122
22. S. Lipovetsky, and M. Conklin Box-Cox generalization of logistic and algebraic binary response models International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management 6 2000 276 285
23. S. Lipovetsky, and M. Conklin Priority estimations by pair comparisons: AHP, Thurstone scaling, Bradley-Terry-Luce, and Markov stochastic modeling Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting August 3-7, 2003, San Francisco, CA 2003
24. C.J. Lloyd Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data 1999 Wiley New York
25. J.S. Long Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables 1997 SAGE Publications London
26. D.B. MakKay, W.M. Bowen, and J.L. Zinnes A Thurstonian view of the analytic hierarchy process European Journal of Operational Research 89 1996 427 444
27. P. McCullagh, and J.A. Nelder Generalized Linear Models 1997 Chapman and Hall London, NY
28. D. Mease A penalized maximum likelihood approach for the ranking of college football teams independent of victory margins The American Statistician 57 2003 241 248
29. F. Mosteller Remarks on the method of paired comparisons Psychometrika 16 1951 3 9 203-218
30. M.A. Saffir Comparative study of scales constructed by three psychological methods Psychometrika 2 1937 179 198
31. S-PLUS'2000, 1999, MathSoft Inc., Seattle, WA
32. H. Stern Models for distributions on permutations Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 1990 558 564
33. T.M. Therneau, and P.M. Grambsch Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model 2000 Springer New York
34. M. Thompson On any given Sunday: fair competitor orderings with maximum likelihood methods Journal of the American Statistical Association 70 1975 536 541
35. L.L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment Psychological Reviews 34 1927 273 286
36. L.L. Thurstone The Measurement of Values 1959 University of Chicago Press Chicago
37. L.L. Thurstone, and L.V. Jones The rational origin for measuring subjective values Journal of the American Statistical Association 52 1957 458 471
38. W.S. Torgerson Theory and Methods of Scaling 1958 Wiley New York