Seismic vulnerability assessment of wall pier supported highway bridges using nonlinear pushover analyses

Engineering Structures

Volumn 27, Issue 14, 2005, Pages 2044-2063

  Bignell, John L ^a   LaFave, James M ^a   Hawkins, Neil M ^a  

^a United States of America   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge; Pushover; Seismic assessment; Southern Illinois; Three dimensional modeling; Wall pier

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE BEARINGS; BRIDGE PIERS; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SUPPORTS;

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WALL PIER;

HIGHWAY BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PIER;

EID: 26844502847     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. C.W. Stover J.L. Coffman Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised) U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527 1993 United States Government Printing Office Washington (DC)
2. O.W. Nuttli The effects of earthquakes in the central United States 3rd ed. 1995 Guttenberg-Richter Publications Marble Hill (MO)
3. Illinois Department of Transportation. Earthquake preparedness plan 2001, Technical report. Springfield (IL): Illinois Department of Transportation, Bureau of Operations; 2001
4. Zhong Q. Assessing the effectiveness of reducing seismic vulnerability by a program of bridge pier wrapping. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2001
5. Bignell J., LaFave J., Hawkins N. General characteristics of wall pier supported bridges. Task I interim report. Springfield (IL): Illinois Department of Transportation; 2003
6. Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI. ABAQUS standard user's manual: Version 6.3; 2002
7. Bignell J., LaFave J., Hawkins N. Wall pier bridge modeling overview. Task II interim report. Springfield (IL): Illinois Department of Transportation; 2003
8. Applied Technology Council. Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges. Provisional recommendations, ATC-32. Redwood City, CA; 1996
9. Inel M. Displacement-based strategies for the performance-based seismic design of short bridges considering embankment flexibility. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2002
10. Wissawapaisal C. Modeling the seismic response of short bridge overcrossings. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2000
11. J. Zhang N. Makris Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffness of bridge embankments Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 2002 1933-1966
12. Mander J.B., Kim D.K., Chen S.S., Premus G. Response of steel bridge bearings to reverse cyclic loading. Technical report NCEER-96-0014. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York at Buffalo; 1996
13. Ash C., Schwartz J., Aschheim M., Hawkins N., Gamble B. Evaluation of elastomeric bridge bearings for seismic design. Report No. ITRC FR 99-4. Springfield (IL): Illinois Transportation Research Center, Illinois Department of Transportation; 2002
14. Meymand P. Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay. Ph.D. thesis. Berkley (CA): University of California; 1998
15. S. Wang B. Kutter J. Chacko D. Wilson R. Boulanger A. Abghari Nonlinear seismic soil-pile structure interaction Earthquake Spectra 12 2 1998 1425-1445
16. Kornkasem W. Seismic behavior of pile-supported bridges. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2001
17. American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Manual of steel construction, load and resistance factor design, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL; 2001
18. Haroun M.A., Pardoen G.C., Shepard R., Haggag H.A., Kazanjy R.P. Cyclic behavior of bridge pier walls for retrofit. Final report to the California Department of Transportation. Irvine (CA): University of California at Irvine; 1993
19. Abo-Shadi N.A., Saiidi M., Sanders D.H. Seismic response of bridge pier walls in the weak direction. Report to the Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Report No. CCEER-99-3. Reno (NV): Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, University of Nevada; 1999
20. American Concrete Institute, Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI Standard ACI 318-02 and ACI 318R-02. Farmington Hills, MI; 2002
21. Bentz E.C. Sectional analysis of reinforced concrete members. Ph.D. thesis. Ontario (Canada): University of Toronto; 2000
22. J.M. Alsiwat M. Saatcioglu Reinforcement anchorage slip under monotonic loading Journal of Structural Engineering 118 9 1992 2421-2438
23. P.F. Silva F. Seible Seismic performance evaluation of cast-in-steel-shell (CISS) piles ACI Structural Journal 98 1 2001 36-49
24. I.M. Viest J.P. Colaco R.W. Furlong L.G. Griffis R.T. Leon L.A. Wyllie Jr. editors. Composite construction: Design for buildings 1997 McGraw-Hill New York (NY)
25. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Earthquake loss estimation methodology: HAZUS99 Technical Manual, http://www.fema.gov/. Washington, DC; 1999